#4Zevi Eckhaus

QB·Washington State·2025

Zevi Eckhaus is a Dual-Threat QB for Washington State. Zevi's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 391 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.46
Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.51
Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Zevi Eckhaus's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing

192/306 Comp/Att2092 Pass yards15 Pass TD12 INT62.7% Comp %

Rushing

371 Rush yards8 Rush TD114 Carries3.3 Yards/carry

Punting

1 Punts30 Punt yards30.0 Yards/punt30 Long1 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

Efficiency0
Volume100
Dual-Threat100
Consistency78
Clutch41

Player type

Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.11 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 0.50 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Louisiana Tech (SP+ -1).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	Rush TD	EPA/play
3	@North Texas	L10-59	13.8	7/10	72	0	0	78.8	3	1	0.49
4	vsWashington	L24-59	18.4	25/36	277	2	2	81.6	10	1	0.20
5	@Colorado State	W20-3	-15.6	16/28	189	2	0	70.6	30	0	0.37
7	@Ole Miss	L21-24	24.0	24/31	218	2	0	78.6	18	0	0.18
8	@Virginia	L20-22	11.1	18/27	183	1	2	44.6	33	1	0.22
9	vsToledo	W28-7	6.0	10/22	159	2	2	69.2	74	1	0.35
10	@Oregon State	L7-10	-15.9	13/24	146	0	2	12.1	24	0	-0.13
12	vsLouisiana Tech	W28-3	-1.3	17/25	146	1	0	82.0	56	2	0.50
13	@James Madison	L20-24	12.3	19/31	171	1	1	61.1	26	1	0.05
14	vsOregon State	W32-8	-15.9	17/28	197	1	0	70.3	63	1	0.31
20	vsUtah State	W34-21	-3.1	26/44	334	3	3	54.3	34	0	—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

57.4%

Passing plays

90.7%

Rushing plays

26.4%

Standard downs

48.6%

Passing downs

75.5%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.24
Passing downs: 0.24
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.19 / 0.41

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).