Skip to content
Waymond Jordan

#2Waymond Jordan

RB·USC·2025

Waymond Jordan is a Featured Back for USC. Waymond's 2025 season ranks in the 78th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 99 plays — a above-average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Waymond Jordan's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
576 Rush yards5 Rush TD88 Carries6.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
7 Receptions55 Rec yards0 Rec TD7.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency78
  • Volume72
  • Explosiveness70
  • Consistency78
  • Receiving43
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)78th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the RB position (78th percentile).
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.26 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.62 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Missouri State (SP+ -11).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6200.62Wk 1 vs Missouri State: +0.62 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Georgia Southern: +0.54 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Purdue: +0.14 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Michigan State: +0.34 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Illinois: +0.09 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Michigan: +0.08 EPA/play7
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsMissouri StateW73-13-10.75428.4111600.62
2vsGeorgia SouthernW59-20-9.41616710.410.54
3@PurdueW33-17-6.118774.311-400.14
4vsMichigan StateW45-31-3.4181578.7022500.34
5@IllinoisL32-3412.920944.7221200.09
7vsMichiganW31-1312.411393.501600.08

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
25.2%
Passing plays
6.0%
Rushing plays
41.9%
Standard downs
29.5%
Passing downs
10.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.26
Passing downs
0.22
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.19 / 0.31

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.