#1Trevor Etienne

RB·Georgia·2024

Trevor Etienne is a Pass-Catching Back for Georgia. Trevor's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 158 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.52
Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.41
Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Trevor Etienne's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing

609 Rush yards9 Rush TD122 Carries5.0 Yards/carry

Receiving

32 Receptions194 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

Efficiency0
Volume68
Explosiveness40
Consistency72
Receiving74

Player type

Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency72th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.09 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 0.92 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Tennessee Tech.

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
Saquon Barkley	Penn State	2016	288	0.340	3.9	97.9
Dalvin Cook	Florida State	2016	292	0.340	4.3	99.3
Travis Etienne	Clemson	2019	213	0.470	4.7	100.1

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Car	Rush Yds	Avg	Rush TD	Rec	Rec Yds	Rec TD	EPA/play
2	vsTennessee Tech	W48-3	—	5	78	15.6	0	2	14	0	0.92
3	@Kentucky	W13-12	5.5	19	79	4.2	0	1	11	0	-0.14
5	@Alabama	L34-41	25.0	12	55	4.6	1	2	11	0	0.35
6	vsAuburn	W31-13	9.5	16	88	5.5	2	6	36	0	0.29
7	vsMississippi State	W41-31	-4.1	11	35	3.2	1	6	35	0	0.26
8	@Texas	W30-15	24.1	19	87	4.6	3	3	23	0	0.41
10	vsFlorida	W34-20	13.8	7	31	4.4	0	—	—	—	0.28
11	@Ole Miss	L10-28	27.9	6	24	4.0	0	3	10	0	-0.01
15	vsTexas	W22-19	24.1	16	94	5.9	2	5	28	0	0.31
20	vsNotre Dame	L10-23	23.9	11	38	3.5	0	4	26	0	—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

23.8%

Passing plays

9.7%

Rushing plays

41.8%

Standard downs

27.2%

Passing downs

15.0%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.23
Passing downs: 0.09
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.29 / 0.18

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).