Skip to content
Tre Garrison

#22Tre Garrison

Tre Garrison is a Pass-Catching Back for Oregon State.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Tre Garrison's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Rushing
8 Rush yards0 Rush TD2 Carries4.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
1 Receptions0 Rec yards0 Rec TD0.0 Yards/rec
Returns
2 Kick returns29 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume6
  • Explosiveness20
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving78
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0401.04Wk 1 vs Houston: -0.17 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Texas Tech: -1.04 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@HoustonL20-336.5284.00-0.17
2vsTexas TechL24-3518.9100-1.04

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
2.1%
Passing plays
0.9%
Rushing plays
5.3%
Standard downs
2.3%
Passing downs
1.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.17
Passing downs
-1.04
Pass / Rush EPA
-1.04 / -0.17

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.