Skip to content
TJ Horton

#4TJ Horton

TJ Horton is a Pass-Catching Back for Ball State. TJ's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 72 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So TJ Horton's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
180 Rush yards0 Rush TD60 Carries3.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
15 Receptions71 Rec yards1 Rec TD4.7 Yards/rec
Returns
11 Kick returns274 KR yards1 KR TD

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

8
Targets
-2.5y
Avg depth
3.6y
After catch
88%
Catch rate

The ball travels -2.5 yards in the air on an average target 11.4 yards shorter than the median. Another 3.6 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
0
short
2
100% · 0y
3
100% · 1y
3
67% · 1y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume34
  • Explosiveness0
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving95
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Peak game: 0.38 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Akron (SP+ -14).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5300.53Wk 1 vs Purdue: -0.29 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs New Hampshire: +0.36 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs UConn: -0.04 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Ohio: +0.08 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Western Michigan: -0.43 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Akron: +0.38 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Northern Illinois: +0.07 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Kent State: -0.10 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Eastern Michigan: -0.28 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Toledo: -0.53 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@PurdueL0-31-6.1310.301140-0.29
3vsNew HampshireW34-298324.0021400.36
4@UConnL25-315.16416.80-0.04
6vsOhioW20-14-4.07263.701300.08
7@Western MichiganL0-42-1.4492.30-0.43
8vsAkronW42-28-13.93227.301-300.38
9@Northern IllinoisL7-21-16.74112.8011900.07
11vsKent StateW17-13-19.3520.403161-0.10
12vsEastern MichiganL9-24-14.712332.80280-0.28
13@ToledoL9-386.0830.40400-0.53

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
12.0%
Passing plays
6.3%
Rushing plays
16.8%
Standard downs
14.6%
Passing downs
7.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.08
Passing downs
-0.18
Pass / Rush EPA
0.34 / -0.24

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.