Skip to content
Taulia Tagovailoa
Taulia Tagovailoa

#3Taulia Tagovailoa

QB·Maryland·2023202220217.0 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Taulia Tagovailoa is a 3-year Dual-Threat QB for Maryland. Taulia's 2021 season ranks in the 18th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 484 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Taulia Tagovailoa's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2021 Production

Passing
328/474 Comp/Att3860 Pass yards26 Pass TD11 INT69.2% Comp %
Rushing
77 Rush yards2 Rush TD80 Carries1.0 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency18
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency81
  • Clutch64
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)18th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency81th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:→ Stable
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.81 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Rutgers (SP+ -3).

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8100.81Wk 1 vs West Virginia: +0.38 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Howard: +0.65 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Illinois: +0.39 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Kent State: +0.50 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Iowa: +0.36 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Ohio State: -0.01 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Minnesota: +0.29 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Indiana: +0.47 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Penn State: +0.23 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Michigan State: +0.06 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Michigan: +0.10 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Rutgers: +0.81 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Virginia Tech: +0.71 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsWest VirginiaW30-241.826/363323074.1300.38
2vsHowardW62-022/272743082.0800.65
3@IllinoisW20-174.332/433501084.62500.39
4vsKent StateW37-16-6.431/413843166.8-300.50
5vsIowaL14-5111.416/291572540.32400.36
6@Ohio StateL17-6629.328/392792245.9-610-0.01
8@MinnesotaL16-3414.417/271891059.41000.29
9vsIndianaW38-35-7.826/404192083.7000.47
10vsPenn StateL14-3114.341/573711152.8-2900.23
11@Michigan StateL21-4011.229/483502145.01200.06
12vsMichiganL18-5923.419/331781145.73010.10
13@RutgersW40-16-3.021/303123090.41610.81
1vsVirginia TechW54-102.420/242652095.84200.71

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
58.3%
Passing plays
95.5%
Rushing plays
12.2%
Standard downs
49.2%
Passing downs
81.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.34
Passing downs
0.46
Pass / Rush EPA
0.39 / 0.40

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.120−0.5120222023
EPA per play · 2021 — 2023 · 37 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021Maryland
7.0
250.9
2022Maryland
5.8
206.5
2023Maryland
7.5
234.8

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.