Skip to content
Shomari Lawrence
Shomari Lawrence

#2Shomari Lawrence

Shomari Lawrence is a Committee Back for Florida International. Shomari's 2024 season produced -3.9 total EPA across 38 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Shomari Lawrence's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
177 Rush yards1 Rush TD47 Carries3.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
1 Receptions1 Rec yards0 Rec TD1.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume29
  • Explosiveness16
  • Consistency53
  • Receiving7
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency53th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.20 from the first to second half of the season.

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4300.43Wk 1 vs Indiana: -0.27 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Central Michigan: -0.24 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Florida Atlantic: -0.18 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Monmouth: -0.25 EPA/play4Wk 9 vs Sam Houston: -0.17 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs New Mexico State: +0.17 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Jacksonville State: +0.26 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Kennesaw State: -0.43 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@IndianaL7-3120.16183.00-0.27
2vsCentral MichiganW52-16-15.89333.70-0.24
3@Florida AtlanticL20-38-12.77152.10-0.18
4vsMonmouthL42-45221.00110-0.25
9vsSam HoustonL7-10-6.98445.50-0.17
10vsNew Mexico StateW34-13-19.05173.400.17
12@Jacksonville StateL31-34-1.08435.410.26
13@Kennesaw StateL26-27-25.1252.50-0.43

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
10.1%
Passing plays
0.4%
Rushing plays
19.0%
Standard downs
12.1%
Passing downs
6.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.11
Passing downs
-0.08
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.08 / -0.10

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.