Skip to content
Seth Henigan

#9Seth Henigan

QB·Memphis·20242023202220214.8 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Seth Henigan is a 4-year Dual-Threat QB for Memphis. Seth's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 541 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Seth Henigan's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2021

3-Star · Developmental
Stars
247 composite
0.8500
National rank
#1,188
High school
Denton Ryan
Hometown
Denton, TX

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2024 Production

Passing
309/477 Comp/Att3502 Pass yards25 Pass TD6 INT64.8% Comp %
Rushing
190 Rush yards1 Rush TD80 Carries2.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat80
  • Consistency85
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency85th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:→ Stable
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.09 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.63 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs UAB (SP+ -11).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6300.63Wk 1 vs North Alabama: +0.56 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Troy: +0.23 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Florida State: +0.30 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Navy: +0.25 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.12 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs South Florida: +0.13 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs North Texas: +0.38 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Charlotte: +0.19 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs UTSA: +0.31 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Rice: +0.21 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UAB: +0.63 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Tulane: +0.42 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsNorth AlabamaW40-022/303082084.0000.56
2vsTroyW38-17-6.620/301611082.82400.23
3@Florida StateW20-12-3.225/382722171.1-700.30
4@NavyL44-563.532/563712153.22900.25
5vsMiddle TennesseeW24-7-24.426/412270038.61400.12
7vsSouth FloridaW21-3-2.328/402082153.02600.13
8vsNorth TexasW52-44-4.524/383191052.4910.38
9vsCharlotteW33-28-15.320/322122140.9-1000.19
10@UTSAL36-442.235/524544149.2800.31
11vsRiceW27-20-11.414/311591136.91800.21
12vsUABW53-18-11.323/342994063.2800.63
14@TulaneW34-245.722/292182080.21000.42
20vsWest VirginiaW42-372.118/262942090.2610

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
60.2%
Passing plays
99.8%
Rushing plays
14.3%
Standard downs
52.9%
Passing downs
77.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.21
Passing downs
0.52
Pass / Rush EPA
0.34 / 0.30

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.260−0.23202220232024
EPA per play · 2021 — 2024 · 50 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021Memphis
7.6
229.5
2022Memphis
3.4
200.8
2023Memphis
9.9
288.8
2024Memphis
4.8
203.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.