Skip to content
Sam Howell

#7Sam Howell

QB·North Carolina·20212020201911.3 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Sam Howell is a 3-year Dual-Threat QB for North Carolina. Sam's 2020 season ranks in the 78th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 429 plays — a above-average rate for the QB. Production has trended downward season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Sam Howell's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2019

4-Star · High major target
Stars
247 composite
0.9582
National rank
#93
High school
Sun Valley
Hometown
Monroe, NC

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2020 Production

Passing
237/348 Comp/Att3586 Pass yards30 Pass TD7 INT68.1% Comp %
Rushing
146 Rush yards5 Rush TD92 Carries1.6 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency78
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat80
  • Consistency88
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)78th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency88th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↓ Declining
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (78th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Production has slipped season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.09 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.80 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Virginia Tech (SP+ 14).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8000.80Wk 2 vs Syracuse: +0.43 EPA/play2Wk 5 vs Boston College: +0.31 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Virginia Tech: +0.80 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Florida State: +0.12 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs NC State: +0.40 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Virginia: +0.61 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Duke: +0.54 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Wake Forest: +0.73 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Notre Dame: +0.32 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Western Carolina: +0.68 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Miami: +0.67 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Texas A&M: +0.29 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
2vsSyracuseW31-6-9.825/34295121200.43
5@Boston CollegeW26-220.914/2622521-100.31
6vsVirginia TechW56-4513.718/23257301900.80
7@Florida StateL28-31-4.920/3637431000.12
8vsNC StateW48-210.018/29252101210.40
9@VirginiaL41-440.923/2844340-2500.61
10@DukeW56-24-4.218/27235313510.54
11vsWake ForestW59-530.832/45550612110.73
13vsNotre DameL17-3121.017/2721110210.32
14vsWestern CarolinaW49-920/23287204100.68
15@MiamiW62-2612.814/1922310510.67
1vsTexas A&ML27-4116.218/31234312500.29

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
52.0%
Passing plays
97.9%
Rushing plays
13.4%
Standard downs
44.6%
Passing downs
72.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.34
Passing downs
0.71
Pass / Rush EPA
0.50 / 0.30

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.150−0.0820202021
EPA per play · 2019 — 2021 · 37 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2019North Carolina
12.9
316.3
2020North Carolina
11.3
263.9
2021North Carolina
7.8
270.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.