Skip to content
RJ Garcia II

#6RJ Garcia II

RJ Garcia II is a Slot Specialist WR for Bowling Green. RJ's 2025 season produced 26.1 total EPA across 48 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So RJ Garcia II's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
27 Receptions283 Rec yards0 Rec TD10.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume21
  • Explosiveness23
  • Consistency64
  • Pass-Down67
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency64th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.46 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.68 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Lafayette.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.6801.68Wk 1 vs Lafayette: +1.68 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Cincinnati: +0.81 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Liberty: -0.25 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Louisville: +0.77 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Ohio: +0.73 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Toledo: +0.95 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Central Michigan: +0.73 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Kent State: +0.38 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Buffalo: -0.39 EPA/play10Wk 13 vs Akron: -0.24 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsLafayetteW26-723216.00251.68
2@CincinnatiL20-344.55357.00100.81
3vsLibertyW23-13-9.033812.7016-0.25
4@LouisvilleL17-4012.43299.70110.77
5@OhioL20-35-4.04348.50210.73
7vsToledoW28-236.02-1-0.5020.95
8vsCentral MichiganL6-27-8.836020.00280.73
9@Kent StateL21-24-19.334816.00180.38
10vsBuffaloL3-28-7.5133.003-0.39
13vsAkronL16-19-13.9155.005-0.24

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
7.4%
Passing plays
16.4%
Rushing plays
0.6%
Standard downs
5.1%
Passing downs
11.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.49
Passing downs
0.59
Pass / Rush EPA
0.46 / 2.37

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.