Skip to content
Nik McMillan

#5Nik McMillan

Nik McMillan is a Vertical Threat WR for Kansas.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Nik McMillan's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Receiving
8 Receptions182 Rec yards2 Rec TD22.8 Yards/rec

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

14
Targets
18.3y
Avg depth
5.0y
After catch
57%
Catch rate

The ball travels 18.3 yards in the air on an average target 9.4 yards deeper than the median. Another 5.0 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
2
100% · 66y
1
100% · 32y
1
0% · 0y
short
6
67% · 66y
2
50% · 18y
2
0% · 0y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume28
  • Explosiveness100
  • Consistency50
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Vertical Threat WR

Elite deep receiver who stretches the field. Wins downfield, commands safety attention, and creates the threat that opens underneath routes.

Downfield threatYAC upsideCreates space for teammates
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.74 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Long Island University.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.7401.74Wk 1 vs Long Island University: +1.74 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Missouri: +0.34 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsLong Island UniversityW51-6613021.71461.74
2vsMissouriL21-3812.925226.01320.34

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
9.7%
Passing plays
24.1%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
9.2%
Passing downs
10.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.72
Passing downs
1.62
Pass / Rush EPA
1.04 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.