Skip to content
Nate Johnson

#3Nate Johnson

RB·Utah·2025

Nate Johnson is a Explosive Back for Utah.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Nate Johnson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
225 Rush yards1 Rush TD24 Carries9.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
1 Receptions16 Rec yards0 Rec TD16.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume11
  • Explosiveness100
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving20
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 1.70 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.96 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Colorado (SP+ -8).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+4.4004.40Wk 1 vs UCLA: +0.35 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Cal Poly: +0.32 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Wyoming: -4.40 EPA/play3Wk 9 vs Colorado: +1.96 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Cincinnati: +0.48 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Baylor: +1.59 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Kansas State: +0.92 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Kansas: +1.28 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@UCLAW43-10-8.7166.000.35
2vsCal PolyW63-911595.400.32
3@WyomingW31-6-11.311616.00-4.40
9vsColoradoW53-7-8.325829.011.96
10vsCincinnatiW45-144.5188.000.48
12@BaylorW55-281.422713.501.59
13vsKansas StateW51-477.04338.3011600.92
14@KansasW31-214.111515.001.28
20vsNebraskaW44-226.2133.00

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
3.7%
Passing plays
0.4%
Rushing plays
6.0%
Standard downs
4.0%
Passing downs
2.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.14
Passing downs
1.19
Pass / Rush EPA
1.75 / 0.35

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.