Skip to content
Nate Bennett

#12Nate Bennett

Nate Bennett is a Dual-Threat QB for Baylor.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

24%
projected
band 6%'25 8%42%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Nate Bennett's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
23/35 Comp/Att301 Pass yards2 Pass TD2 INT65.7% Comp %
Rushing
13 Rush yards1 Rush TD2 Carries6.5 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

33
Attempts
10.4y
Avg depth
8.6y
After catch
70%
Catch rate

The ball travels 10.4 yards in the air on an average throw 1.9 yards deeper than the median. Another 8.6 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
4
25% · 21y
1
0% · 0y
2
50% · 33y
short
8
88% · 42y
4
75% · 45y
14
79% · 160y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency90
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)90th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
2vsPrairie View A&MW44-323/353012229.61310.44

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
44.7%
Passing plays
86.0%
Rushing plays
2.4%
Standard downs
37.3%
Passing downs
61.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.22
Passing downs
0.97
Pass / Rush EPA
0.42 / 2.58

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.