Skip to content
Markell Jones

#8Markell Jones

RB·Purdue·20152.6 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Markell Jones is a Committee Back for Purdue. Markell's 2015 season ranks in the 43th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 210 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Markell Jones's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2015

3-Star · Developmental
Stars
247 composite
0.8358
National rank
#1,306
High school
Columbus East
Hometown
Columbus, IN

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2015 Production

Rushing
875 Rush yards10 Rush TD168 Carries5.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
34 Receptions239 Rec yards1 Rec TD7.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2015 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency43
  • Volume66
  • Explosiveness44
  • Consistency40
  • Receiving65
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)43th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency40th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.61 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Virginia Tech (SP+ 11).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6100.61Wk 1 vs Marshall: +0.17 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Indiana State: +0.38 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Virginia Tech: +0.61 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Bowling Green: -0.12 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Michigan State: +0.19 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Minnesota: -0.32 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Wisconsin: -0.11 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Nebraska: +0.25 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Illinois: +0.02 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Northwestern: +0.56 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Iowa: -0.01 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Indiana: -0.01 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@MarshallL31-413.512726.010.17
2vsIndiana StateW38-1414674.8143210.38
3vsVirginia TechL24-5111.469015.011100.61
4vsBowling GreenL28-357.56193.204230-0.12
5@Michigan StateL21-2415.6221577.121200.19
6vsMinnesotaL13-418.1671.20-0.32
7@WisconsinL7-2415.112463.803290-0.11
9vsNebraskaW55-4511.123924.0255100.25
10vsIllinoisL14-482.714846.0051300.02
11@NorthwesternL14-210.213584.5156800.56
12@IowaL20-409.324873.61280-0.01
13vsIndianaL36-540.416966.014120-0.01

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
23.1%
Passing plays
8.3%
Rushing plays
43.4%
Standard downs
27.6%
Passing downs
14.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.08
Passing downs
0.41
Pass / Rush EPA
0.23 / 0.13

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.710−0.42
EPA per play · 2015 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.