Skip to content
Maddux Madsen

#4Maddux Madsen

QB·Boise State·20247.5 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Maddux Madsen is a Dual-Threat QB for Boise State. Maddux's 2024 season ranks in the 63th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 434 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Maddux Madsen's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing
247/396 Comp/Att3018 Pass yards23 Pass TD6 INT62.4% Comp %
Rushing
221 Rush yards5 Rush TD57 Carries3.9 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

28
Attempts
7.3y
Avg depth
5.0y
After catch
50%
Catch rate

The ball travels 7.3 yards in the air on an average throw 0.5 yards shorter than the median. Another 5.0 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
1
0% · 0y
short
11
64% · 89y
3
33% · 7y
13
46% · 72y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency63
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency80
  • Clutch27
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)63th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.16 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.96 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs San Diego State (SP+ -15).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9600.96Wk 1 vs Georgia Southern: +0.54 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Oregon: +0.03 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Portland State: +0.71 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Washington State: +0.60 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Utah State: +0.80 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Hawai'i: +0.60 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs UNLV: +0.42 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs San Diego State: +0.96 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Nevada: +0.18 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs San José State: +0.65 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Wyoming: -0.11 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Oregon State: +0.28 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs UNLV: +0.23 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@Georgia SouthernW56-45-1.722/312801169.20.54
2@OregonL34-3726.017/401481057.4700.03
4vsPortland StateW56-1413/181883079.11210.71
5vsWashington StateW45-241.312/211842142.92000.60
6vsUtah StateW62-30-10.421/252563092.6-500.80
7@Hawai'iW28-7-10.917/252172078.1400.60
9@UNLVW29-249.318/332091084.55810.42
10vsSan Diego StateW56-24-15.424/323074098.02500.96
11vsNevadaW28-21-15.29/201191155.65800.18
12@San José StateW42-21-5.522/302861087.9510.65
13@WyomingW17-13-13.614/261670018.2-60-0.11
14vsOregon StateW34-18-6.717/331952064.13710.28
15vsUNLVW21-79.318/271581083.5910.23
20vsPenn StateL14-3124.623/353041386.2-30

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
46.5%
Passing plays
95.0%
Rushing plays
8.4%
Standard downs
37.3%
Passing downs
68.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.47
Passing downs
0.40
Pass / Rush EPA
0.41 / 0.69

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.070−0.22
EPA per play · 2024 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.