Skip to content
Luke Falk

#4Luke Falk

QB·Washington State·201620156.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Luke Falk is a 2-year Clutch Passer for Washington State. Luke's 2015 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 713 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Luke Falk's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2015 Production

Passing
448/645 Comp/Att4566 Pass yards38 Pass TD8 INT69.5% Comp %
Rushing
-115 Rush yards3 Rush TD82 Carries-1.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2015 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency3
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat5
  • Consistency83
  • Clutch97
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency83th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.48 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Arizona (SP+ 5).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4800.48Wk 1 vs Portland State: +0.28 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Rutgers: +0.32 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Wyoming: +0.29 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs California: +0.16 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Oregon: +0.24 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Oregon State: +0.45 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Arizona: +0.48 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Stanford: +0.22 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Arizona State: +0.43 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UCLA: +0.14 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Colorado: -0.01 EPA/play12Wk 1 vs Miami: +0.07 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsPortland StateL17-2427/412892064.3800.28
2@RutgersW37-34-10.147/664784068.62900.32
3vsWyomingW31-14-16.737/453032162.8-2210.29
5@CaliforniaL28-3412.135/493892166.4-2510.16
6@OregonW45-3815.950/745055058.5-4910.24
7vsOregon StateW52-31-10.139/504076286.6-1900.45
8@ArizonaW45-424.747/625145086.11600.48
9vsStanfordL28-3022.835/613542240.8-700.22
10vsArizona StateW38-2410.236/554975170.5-2400.43
11@UCLAW31-2718.638/533312162.3-1700.14
12vsColoradoW27-3-4.027/351991079.7-40-0.01
1vsMiamiW20-1411.030/543002051.8-100.07

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
73.8%
Passing plays
94.8%
Rushing plays
19.7%
Standard downs
69.5%
Passing downs
83.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.45
Pass / Rush EPA
0.29 / -0.07

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.830−0.092016
EPA per play · 2015 — 2016 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2015Washington State
6.4
245.3
2016Washington State
10.1
282.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.