Skip to content
Luke Falk

#4Luke Falk

QB·Washington State·2016201510.1 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Luke Falk is a 2-year Clutch Passer for Washington State. Luke's 2016 season ranks in the 38th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 672 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Luke Falk's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Passing
443/633 Comp/Att4468 Pass yards38 Pass TD11 INT70.0% Comp %
Rushing
-68 Rush yards0 Rush TD66 Carries-1.0 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency38
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency78
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)38th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.76 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Arizona (SP+ -5).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Casey ThompsonNebraska0.52812.6351.4
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7600.76Wk 1 vs Eastern Washington: +0.42 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Boise State: +0.14 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Idaho: +0.29 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Oregon: +0.36 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Stanford: +0.63 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs UCLA: +0.03 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Arizona State: +0.25 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Oregon State: +0.49 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Arizona: +0.76 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs California: +0.47 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Colorado: +0.08 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Washington: +0.09 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Minnesota: +0.01 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsEastern WashingtonL42-4541/514184176.3-1100.42
2@Boise StateL28-3111.555/714804168.1-200.14
3vsIdahoW56-6-8.621/362263079.01200.29
5vsOregonW51-336.136/483711084.0700.36
6@StanfordW42-1616.430/413574284.1-300.63
7vsUCLAW27-219.128/482610147.2-100.03
8@Arizona StateW37-32-3.042/533983064.2-6100.25
9@Oregon StateW35-31-4.633/464155072.5-300.49
10vsArizonaW69-7-4.532/353114094.0800.76
11vsCaliforniaW56-212.436/503735183.4600.47
12@ColoradoL24-386.326/533253153.2-400.08
13vsWashingtonL17-4526.733/502691354.9-400.09
1vsMinnesotaL12-1712.630/512641120.7-1200.01

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
67.4%
Passing plays
95.4%
Rushing plays
11.6%
Standard downs
62.3%
Passing downs
79.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.14
Passing downs
0.52
Pass / Rush EPA
0.30 / -0.10

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.830−0.092016
EPA per play · 2015 — 2016 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2015Washington State
6.4
245.3
2016Washington State
10.1
282.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.