#4Logan Fife

QB·New Mexico State·2025

Logan Fife is a Clutch Passer for New Mexico State. Logan's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 448 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.46
Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.51
Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Logan Fife's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing

203/361 Comp/Att2232 Pass yards11 Pass TD12 INT56.2% Comp %

Rushing

-3 Rush yards1 Rush TD83 Carries-0.0 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

Efficiency0
Volume100
Dual-Threat35
Consistency33
Clutch94

Player type

Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency33th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.26 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 0.62 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Sam Houston (SP+ -28).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	Rush TD	EPA/play
1	vsBryant	W19-3	—	14/31	227	1	1	6.6	1	0	0.23
2	vsTulsa	W21-14	-10.0	27/44	248	2	0	35.2	28	0	0.26
3	@Louisiana Tech	L14-49	-1.3	17/33	281	2	2	40.1	8	0	0.30
5	@New Mexico	L20-38	0.9	20/37	255	0	1	10.2	-39	0	-0.22
6	vsSam Houston	W37-10	-27.8	19/26	255	1	0	67.4	4	1	0.62
8	@Liberty	L27-30	-9.0	20/37	242	2	0	53.5	16	0	0.14
9	vsMissouri State	L17-24	-10.7	22/34	207	1	4	15.4	3	0	-0.08
10	@Western Kentucky	L16-35	1.6	13/39	110	0	1	11.8	22	0	-0.03
11	vsKennesaw State	L21-24	-5.4	28/46	241	2	2	35.4	-21	0	0.05
12	@Tennessee	L9-42	15.0	23/34	166	0	1	26.4	-25	0	-0.19

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

64.9%

Passing plays

93.6%

Rushing plays

22.0%

Standard downs

58.6%

Passing downs

75.8%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: -0.01
Passing downs: 0.27
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.14 / 0.08

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).