Skip to content
LJ Martin

#4LJ Martin

RB·BYU·20252.1 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

LJ Martin is a Featured Back for BYU. LJ's 2025 season ranks in the 25th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 267 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So LJ Martin's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
1305 Rush yards12 Rush TD236 Carries5.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
36 Receptions255 Rec yards0 Rec TD7.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency25
  • Volume89
  • Explosiveness50
  • Consistency57
  • Receiving62
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)25th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency57th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.14 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.98 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Portland State.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9800.98Wk 1 vs Portland State: +0.98 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Stanford: +0.21 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs East Carolina: +0.23 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Colorado: -0.15 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs West Virginia: +0.29 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Arizona: +0.20 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Utah: -0.09 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Iowa State: +0.04 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Texas Tech: -0.09 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs TCU: +0.15 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Cincinnati: +0.51 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs UCF: +0.28 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Texas Tech: +0.01 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsPortland StateW69-0813116.4011200.98
2vsStanfordW27-3-11.8181106.101800.21
4@East CarolinaW34-138.0141017.210.23
5@ColoradoW24-21-8.315583.904360-0.15
6vsWest VirginiaW38-24-6.821904.3222100.29
7@ArizonaW33-2712.0251626.511000.20
8vsUtahW24-2122.2261224.70250-0.09
9@Iowa StateW41-279.95153.010.04
11@Texas TechL7-2927.610353.506290-0.09
12vsTCUW44-138.321884.2143400.15
13@CincinnatiW26-144.5322226.9234400.51
14vsUCFW41-21-1.222954.3353500.28
15vsTexas TechL7-3427.619764.0173100.01

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
31.2%
Passing plays
10.7%
Rushing plays
47.5%
Standard downs
34.3%
Passing downs
23.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.15
Passing downs
0.38
Pass / Rush EPA
0.20 / 0.20

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.090−0.26
EPA per play · 2025 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Lj Martin Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Byu · Gridpex