Skip to content
Kenji Christian

#3Kenji Christian

RB·UConn·2026

Kenji Christian is a Pass-Catching Back for UConn.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kenji Christian's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Rushing
63 Rush yards1 Rush TD16 Carries3.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
4 Receptions36 Rec yards1 Rec TD9.0 Yards/rec
Returns
3 Kick returns62 KR yards0 KR TD

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

6
Targets
-0.7y
Avg depth
10.5y
After catch
67%
Catch rate

The ball travels -0.7 yards in the air on an average target 9.6 yards shorter than the median. Another 10.5 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
0
short
2
100% · 14y
0
4
50% · 22y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency98
  • Volume47
  • Explosiveness18
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving100
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)98th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.74 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Lafayette.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7400.74Wk 1 vs Lafayette: +0.74 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Maryland: -0.09 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsLafayetteW56-77466.6122210.74
2vsMarylandL14-389.19171.902140-0.09

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
16.5%
Passing plays
10.7%
Rushing plays
22.1%
Standard downs
19.0%
Passing downs
11.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.16
Passing downs
1.14
Pass / Rush EPA
1.23 / 0.04

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.