Skip to content
Josh Johnson

#8Josh Johnson

RB·UL Monroe·20191.8 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Josh Johnson is a Explosive Back for UL Monroe. Josh's 2019 season ranks in the 20th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 208 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Josh Johnson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2019 Production

Rushing
1298 Rush yards11 Rush TD201 Carries6.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
13 Receptions122 Rec yards0 Rec TD9.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency20
  • Volume69
  • Explosiveness70
  • Consistency34
  • Receiving32
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)20th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency34th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.46 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 3.84 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Grambling.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+3.8403.84Wk 1 vs Grambling: +3.84 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Florida State: +0.08 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Iowa State: +0.16 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs South Alabama: -0.17 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Memphis: +0.35 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Texas State: -0.04 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs App State: +0.05 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Arkansas State: +0.06 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Georgia State: +0.52 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Georgia Southern: +0.01 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.39 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Louisiana: +0.42 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsGramblingW31-91017317.323.84
2@Florida StateL44-451.8261264.811300.08
4@Iowa StateL20-7212.614876.210.16
5vsSouth AlabamaW30-17-20.315936.20-0.17
6vsMemphisL33-5218.0191196.3021300.35
7@Texas StateW24-14-16.2221145.22-0.04
8@App StateL7-5211.313775.900.05
10vsArkansas StateL41-48-2.918603.3142300.06
11vsGeorgia StateW45-31-10.5201688.421800.52
12@Georgia SouthernL29-51-4.512433.6022200.01
13vsCoastal CarolinaW45-42-12.8191296.821100.39
14@LouisianaL30-319.6131098.4025200.42

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
24.1%
Passing plays
4.3%
Rushing plays
43.2%
Standard downs
28.5%
Passing downs
14.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.25
Passing downs
0.06
Pass / Rush EPA
0.41 / 0.19

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+4.250−0.57
EPA per play · 2019 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.