Skip to content
Joe Jackson

#4Joe Jackson

Joe Jackson is a Pass-Catching Back for Kansas State.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

22%
projected
band 14%'25 26%29%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Joe Jackson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Rushing
106 Rush yards1 Rush TD17 Carries6.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
6 Receptions96 Rec yards2 Rec TD16.0 Yards/rec

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

7
Targets
2.3y
Avg depth
14.0y
After catch
86%
Catch rate

The ball travels 2.3 yards in the air on an average target 6.6 yards shorter than the median. Another 14.0 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
0
short
2
50% · 43y
2
100% · 26y
3
100% · 27y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume46
  • Explosiveness64
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving100
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.61 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Washington State (SP+ -4).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6100.61Wk 1 vs Nicholls: +0.60 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Washington State: +0.61 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNichollsW71-37385.4124810.60
2vsWashington StateW34-7-3.710686.8044810.61

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
16.2%
Passing plays
11.5%
Rushing plays
20.2%
Standard downs
13.6%
Passing downs
22.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.13
Passing downs
1.59
Pass / Rush EPA
1.49 / 0.06

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.