Skip to content
Jeremiah Hasley

#85Jeremiah Hasley

TE·Duke·2025

Jeremiah Hasley is a Versatile TE for Duke. Jeremiah's 2025 season produced 38.3 total EPA across 49 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.42
    Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.46
    Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jeremiah Hasley's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
40 Receptions454 Rec yards6 Rec TD11.3 Yards/rec

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

12
Targets
6.3y
Avg depth
12.8y
After catch
42%
Catch rate

The ball travels 6.3 yards in the air on an average target 2.6 yards shorter than the median. Another 12.8 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
1
0% · 0y
0
0
short
3
67% · 33y
3
0% · 0y
5
60% · 56y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume17
  • Explosiveness29
  • Consistency68
  • Pass-Down84
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency68th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.73 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.88 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Clemson (SP+ 10).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ty ThompsonTulane0.4200.720.2
Seth GreenMinnesota0.3900.032.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.8802.88Wk 1 vs Elon: +0.06 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Illinois: -0.23 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Tulane: -0.11 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs NC State: +1.41 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Syracuse: +0.11 EPA/play5Wk 8 vs Georgia Tech: +0.26 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Clemson: +2.88 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UConn: +0.68 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Virginia: +0.98 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs North Carolina: +0.77 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Wake Forest: +1.16 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Virginia: +1.30 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsElonW45-17155.0050.06
2vsIllinoisL19-4512.9166.006-0.23
3@TulaneL27-346.32147.007-0.11
4vsNC StateW45-334.844310.80211.41
5@SyracuseW38-3-13.1155.0050.11
8vsGeorgia TechL18-279.3199.0090.26
10@ClemsonW46-459.538327.70562.88
11@UConnL34-375.146115.31260.68
12vsVirginiaL17-3411.134715.70300.98
13@North CarolinaW32-25-6.678512.11270.77
14vsWake ForestW49-325.74276.81111.16
15vsVirginiaW27-2011.13196.32121.30
20vsArizona StateW42-393.96508.3114

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.8%
Passing plays
10.6%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
5.1%
Passing downs
7.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.70
Passing downs
0.91
Pass / Rush EPA
0.78 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.