Skip to content
Jayce Brown

#1Jayce Brown

Jayce Brown is a Versatile WR for Kansas State. Jayce's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 76 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jayce Brown's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
41 Receptions712 Rec yards5 Rec TD17.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume39
  • Explosiveness69
  • Consistency74
  • Pass-Down14
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.43 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.71 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Kansas (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.7101.71Wk 1 vs North Dakota: +0.81 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Army: -0.11 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Arizona: +0.73 EPA/play3Wk 6 vs Baylor: +1.12 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs TCU: +0.34 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Kansas: +1.71 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Texas Tech: -0.14 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Oklahoma State: +1.70 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
0vsIowa StateL21-249.947819.5137
1vsNorth DakotaW38-35121099.11440.81
2vsArmyL21-240.83299.7017-0.11
3@ArizonaL17-2312.066811.30310.73
6@BaylorL34-351.4410626.51481.12
7vsTCUW41-288.33279.00110.34
9@KansasW42-174.1416040.01781.71
10vsTexas TechL20-4327.625326.5056-0.14
12@Oklahoma StateW14-6-15.138227.31341.70

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
13.6%
Passing plays
24.3%
Rushing plays
2.6%
Standard downs
13.3%
Passing downs
14.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.71
Passing downs
0.49
Pass / Rush EPA
0.59 / 0.90

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.