Skip to content
Jalen Milroe

#4Jalen Milroe

QB·Alabama·2024202311.0 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Jalen Milroe is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Alabama. Jalen's 2023 season ranks in the 73th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 435 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jalen Milroe's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
187/284 Comp/Att2834 Pass yards23 Pass TD6 INT65.8% Comp %
Rushing
531 Rush yards12 Rush TD161 Carries3.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency73
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency90
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)73th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency90th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.85 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Kentucky (SP+ 11).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8500.85Wk 1 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.81 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Texas: +0.47 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Ole Miss: +0.38 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Mississippi State: +0.85 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Texas A&M: +0.57 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Arkansas: +0.41 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Tennessee: +0.26 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs LSU: +0.70 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Kentucky: +0.85 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Chattanooga: +0.68 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Auburn: +0.61 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Georgia: +0.31 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsMiddle TennesseeW56-7-9.513/181943094.04820.81
2vsTexasL24-3423.214/272552265.64400.47
4vsOle MissW24-1018.417/212251164.02800.38
5@Mississippi StateW40-170.510/121640096.86920.85
6@Texas A&MW26-2015.621/333213176.0-3100.57
7vsArkansasW24-213.510/212382067.7-1910.41
8vsTennesseeW34-2016.214/212202172.6300.26
10vsLSUW42-2819.115/232190096.415540.70
11@KentuckyW49-2110.515/222343194.53630.85
12vsChattanoogaW66-1013/161973088.3-100.68
13@AuburnW27-247.616/242592089.510700.61
14vsGeorgiaW27-2431.213/231922075.42900.31
20vsMichiganL20-2731.316/231160045.1630

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
53.6%
Passing plays
94.7%
Rushing plays
24.5%
Standard downs
46.0%
Passing downs
70.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.28
Passing downs
0.77
Pass / Rush EPA
0.44 / 0.58

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.500−0.342024
EPA per play · 2023 — 2024 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2023Alabama
11.0
284.8
2024Alabama
9.3
252.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.