Skip to content
Jalen Hurts

#1Jalen Hurts

QB·Alabama·2019201720165.6 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Jalen Hurts is a 3-year Dual-Threat QB for Alabama. Jalen's 2017 season ranks in the 30th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 397 plays — a developing rate for the QB. Jalen's production has improved each season, a positive development trajectory.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jalen Hurts's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2016

4-Star · High major target
Stars
247 composite
0.9262
National rank
#175
High school
Channelview
Hometown
Channelview, TX

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2017 Production

Passing
154/254 Comp/Att2081 Pass yards17 Pass TD1 INT60.6% Comp %
Rushing
855 Rush yards8 Rush TD154 Carries5.6 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency30
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency62
  • Clutch35
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)30th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency62th %ile · average
Career trajectory:↑ Rising
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Career trajectory is upward — WEPA value has improved season over season.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.13 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.13 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Mercer.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.1302.13Wk 1 vs Florida State: -0.06 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Fresno State: +0.74 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Colorado State: +0.91 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Vanderbilt: +0.02 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Ole Miss: +0.55 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Texas A&M: +0.14 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Arkansas: +0.26 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Tennessee: +0.33 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs LSU: +0.29 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Mississippi State: +0.39 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Mercer: +2.13 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Auburn: +0.13 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Georgia: +0.10 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Clemson: +0.10 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsFlorida StateW24-722.810/18961029.5550-0.06
2vsFresno StateW41-10-2.714/181281098.815420.74
3vsColorado StateW41-233.912/172482098.510310.91
4@VanderbiltW59-00.69/17780035.94800.02
5vsOle MissW66-311.612/191972096.510110.55
6@Texas A&MW27-199.413/221231049.15610.14
7vsArkansasW41-92.112/191551161.94110.26
8vsTennesseeW45-71.213/211981062.51400.33
10vsLSUW24-1021.111/241831053.14410.29
11@Mississippi StateW31-2416.010/182421091.74010.39
12vsMercerW56-07/718030100.03002.13
13@AuburnL14-2624.712/221121046.28200.13
1vsGeorgiaW26-2326.73/8210031.04700.10
1vsClemsonW24-626.416/241202056.24000.10

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
42.1%
Passing plays
77.5%
Rushing plays
22.0%
Standard downs
35.9%
Passing downs
60.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.34
Passing downs
0.32
Pass / Rush EPA
0.27 / 0.48

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+2.370−0.4620172019
EPA per play · 2016 — 2019 · 43 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2016Alabama
7.4
254.4
2017Alabama
5.6
182.3
2019Oklahoma
17.3
394.2

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.