#2Jack Layne

QB·New Mexico·2025

Jack Layne is a Dual-Threat QB for New Mexico. Jack's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 424 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.46
Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.51
Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jack Layne's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing

213/327 Comp/Att2486 Pass yards13 Pass TD10 INT65.1% Comp %

Rushing

152 Rush yards4 Rush TD87 Carries1.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

Efficiency0
Volume100
Dual-Threat100
Consistency73
Clutch93

Player type

Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency73th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Peak game: 0.76 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs New Mexico State (SP+ -16).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	Rush TD	EPA/play
1	@Michigan	L17-34	12.4	31/47	208	1	3	55.1	-12	0	-0.02
2	vsIdaho State	W32-22	—	13/21	155	0	0	35.0	4	1	0.27
3	@UCLA	W35-10	-8.7	12/16	152	2	0	74.5	2	0	0.51
5	vsNew Mexico State	W38-20	-15.5	23/30	303	4	0	71.7	13	0	0.76
6	@San José State	L28-35	-14.3	28/40	344	0	3	53.5	-1	1	0.20
7	@Boise State	L25-41	3.1	7/17	115	1	2	20.3	-4	0	0.16
8	vsNevada	W24-22	-13.4	14/22	138	0	0	27.4	71	0	0.12
9	vsUtah State	W33-14	-3.1	17/22	183	1	0	64.0	18	0	0.27
10	@UNLV	W40-35	4.3	17/22	342	3	1	70.0	3	0	0.71
12	vsColorado State	W20-17	-15.6	13/25	226	0	0	73.9	23	1	0.26
13	@Air Force	W20-3	-3.2	10/15	105	0	0	59.0	24	1	0.22
14	vsSan Diego State	W23-17	6.7	14/25	127	1	0	36.4	9	0	-0.10
20	vsMinnesota	L17-20	1.5	14/25	88	0	1	22.8	2	0	—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

50.0%

Passing plays

93.6%

Rushing plays

12.9%

Standard downs

42.4%

Passing downs

67.4%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.11
Passing downs: 0.37
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.19 / 0.50

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).