Skip to content
Holton Ahlers

#12Holton Ahlers

QB·East Carolina·2022202120197.9 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Holton Ahlers is a 3-year Dual-Threat QB for East Carolina. Holton's 2019 season ranks in the 40th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 505 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Holton Ahlers's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2019 Production

Passing
264/442 Comp/Att3387 Pass yards21 Pass TD10 INT59.7% Comp %
Rushing
359 Rush yards6 Rush TD108 Carries3.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency40
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat58
  • Consistency79
  • Clutch82
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)40th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency79th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:→ Stable
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.24 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.85 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs SMU (SP+ 4).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8500.85Wk 1 vs NC State: -0.01 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Gardner-Webb: +0.31 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Navy: +0.23 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs William & Mary: +0.11 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Old Dominion: +0.24 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Temple: +0.18 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs UCF: +0.21 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs South Florida: +0.25 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Cincinnati: +0.51 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs SMU: +0.85 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs UConn: +0.39 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Tulsa: +0.30 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@NC StateL6-34-6.322/391680123.2110-0.01
2vsGardner-WebbW48-918/291951188.37820.31
3@NavyL10-429.911/231380145.13610.23
4vsWilliam & MaryW19-720/342101037.76000.11
5@Old DominionW24-21-24.48/212022214.5100.24
6vsTempleL17-273.219/392292038.42600.18
8@UCFL28-4119.123/373131157.64710.21
9vsSouth FloridaL20-45-9.818/282170126.5-300.25
10vsCincinnatiL43-469.132/52535412110.51
11@SMUL51-594.432/42498602500.85
13@UConnW31-24-24.434/50374122210.39
14vsTulsaL24-49-2.527/48308303500.30

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
59.5%
Passing plays
98.1%
Rushing plays
21.3%
Standard downs
50.0%
Passing downs
76.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.24
Passing downs
0.44
Pass / Rush EPA
0.36 / 0.19

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.060−0.6420212022
EPA per play · 2019 — 2022 · 37 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2019East Carolina
7.9
227.3
2021East Carolina
7.1
238.5
2022East Carolina
8.2
251.7

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.