Skip to content
Hank Bachmeier

#9Hank Bachmeier

QB·Boise State·20218.7 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Hank Bachmeier is a Dual-Threat QB for Boise State. Hank's 2021 season ranks in the 45th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 444 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Hank Bachmeier's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2021 Production

Passing
252/401 Comp/Att3079 Pass yards20 Pass TD8 INT62.8% Comp %
Rushing
-20 Rush yards0 Rush TD60 Carries-0.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency45
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat96
  • Consistency88
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)45th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency88th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.08 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.71 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs UTEP (SP+ -4).

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7100.71Wk 1 vs UCF: +0.32 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UTEP: +0.71 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Oklahoma State: +0.41 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Utah State: +0.40 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Nevada: +0.44 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs BYU: +0.19 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Air Force: +0.22 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Colorado State: +0.54 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Fresno State: +0.40 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Wyoming: +0.36 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs New Mexico: +0.22 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs San Diego State: +0.22 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@UCFL31-364.825/392632175.1-700.32
2vsUTEPW54-13-4.217/243402092.7-100.71
3vsOklahoma StateL20-2117.222/342421177.7-200.41
4@Utah StateW27-30.122/392862180.04400.40
5vsNevadaL31-413.634/473884171.1-4900.44
6@BYUW26-178.918/291720064.6300.19
7vsAir ForceL17-247.423/362591150.3-400.22
9@Colorado StateW28-19-2.421/322533081.2-700.54
10@Fresno StateW40-1410.815/272831080.9800.40
11vsWyomingW23-130.623/322251060.7-800.36
12vsNew MexicoW37-0-18.611/221461117.3300.22
13@San Diego StateL16-278.321/402222252.8000.22

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
52.8%
Passing plays
96.0%
Rushing plays
9.0%
Standard downs
47.8%
Passing downs
63.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.19
Passing downs
0.65
Pass / Rush EPA
0.37 / 0.38

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.76+0.14
EPA per play · 2021 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.