Skip to content
Garrett Grayson

#18Garrett Grayson

QB·Colorado State·201411.0 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Garrett Grayson is a Clutch Passer for Colorado State. Garrett's 2014 season ranks in the 80th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 426 plays — a above-average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Garrett Grayson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Passing
270/420 Comp/Att4006 Pass yards32 Pass TD7 INT64.3% Comp %
Rushing
-46 Rush yards0 Rush TD57 Carries-0.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency80
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat27
  • Consistency80
  • Clutch84
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)80th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (80th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.21 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.30 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Wyoming (SP+ -14).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.3001.30Wk 1 vs Colorado: +0.34 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Boise State: +0.36 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UC Davis: +0.74 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Boston College: +0.20 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Tulsa: +0.63 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Nevada: +0.44 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Utah State: +0.14 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Wyoming: +1.30 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Hawai'i: +0.71 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs New Mexico: +0.91 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Air Force: +0.27 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Utah: +0.10 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsColoradoW31-17-5.013/231341070.8300.34
2@Boise StateL24-3711.631/584343264.3-600.36
3vsUC DavisW49-2122/314254093.2600.74
5@Boston CollegeW24-214.927/412682255.0-500.20
6vsTulsaW42-17-15.812/182363183.1300.63
7@NevadaW31-24-7.326/363263086.0600.44
8vsUtah StateW16-136.020/312430041.2-2500.14
9vsWyomingW45-31-14.018/213905098.9-301.30
10@San José StateW38-31-11.522/282901093.8-80
11vsHawai'iW49-22-15.013/242784035.1-100.71
13vsNew MexicoW58-20-15.023/293893093.41700.91
14@Air ForceL24-27-1.423/463663146.2-1200.27
1vsUtahL10-458.820/342270134.7-2100.10

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
53.9%
Passing plays
93.7%
Rushing plays
9.0%
Standard downs
46.5%
Passing downs
67.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.35
Passing downs
0.57
Pass / Rush EPA
0.48 / 0.04

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.420−0.02
EPA per play · 2014 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.