Skip to content
Dierre Hill Jr.

#6Dierre Hill Jr.

Dierre Hill Jr. is a Pass-Catching Back for Oregon. Dierre's 2026 season produced -3.5 total EPA across 33 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

12%
projected
band 5%'25 9%19%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Dierre Hill Jr.'s projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Rushing
110 Rush yards0 Rush TD25 Carries4.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
5 Receptions14 Rec yards0 Rec TD2.8 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns21 KR yards0 KR TD

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

8
Targets
-1.0y
Avg depth
6.0y
After catch
63%
Catch rate

The ball travels -1.0 yards in the air on an average target 9.9 yards shorter than the median. Another 6.0 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
0
short
1
100% · 6y
1
100% · 12y
6
50% · -4y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume75
  • Explosiveness28
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving76
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3700.37Wk 1 vs Boise State: -0.37 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Oklahoma State: +0.11 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsBoise StateW34-275.210363.60360-0.37
2@Oklahoma StateL31-391.115744.902800.11

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
26.4%
Passing plays
11.1%
Rushing plays
49.0%
Standard downs
35.0%
Passing downs
11.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.16
Passing downs
0.19
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.56 / 0.04

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.