Skip to content
Desmond Trotter

#1Desmond Trotter

Desmond Trotter is a Dual-Threat QB for South Alabama. Desmond's 2023 season produced 20.0 total EPA across 44 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Desmond Trotter's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
29/41 Comp/Att351 Pass yards5 Pass TD2 INT70.7% Comp %
Rushing
55 Rush yards1 Rush TD14 Carries3.9 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency25
  • Volume66
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)25th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.84 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Texas State (SP+ -2).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8400.84Wk 12 vs Marshall: +0.69 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Texas State: +0.84 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
12vsMarshallW28-0-9.02/3200094.81300.69
13@Texas StateL44-52-1.618/212164186.21500.84
20@Eastern MichiganW59-10-12.39/171151158.2271

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
23.1%
Passing plays
36.8%
Rushing plays
10.1%
Standard downs
23.2%
Passing downs
23.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.04
Passing downs
1.32
Pass / Rush EPA
0.44 / 0.50

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.