Skip to content
Darius Anderson

#6Darius Anderson

RB·TCU·20172.2 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Darius Anderson is a Explosive Back for TCU. Darius's 2017 season ranks in the 68th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 130 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Darius Anderson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2017 Production

Rushing
768 Rush yards8 Rush TD128 Carries6.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
9 Receptions57 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency68
  • Volume56
  • Explosiveness60
  • Consistency48
  • Receiving30
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)68th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency48th %ile · average
Key findings
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.14 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.74 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Oklahoma (SP+ 26).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7400.74Wk 1 vs Jackson State: +0.13 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Arkansas: +0.47 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs SMU: +0.32 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Oklahoma State: +0.47 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs West Virginia: -0.10 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Kansas State: -0.46 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Kansas: -0.01 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Iowa State: +0.26 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Texas: +0.04 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Oklahoma: +0.74 EPA/play11
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsJackson StateW63-013675.201600.13
2@ArkansasW28-72.1151067.110.47
3vsSMUW56-36-2.914896.420.32
4@Oklahoma StateW44-3119.1261606.2344100.47
6vsWest VirginiaW31-245.69434.80-0.10
7@Kansas StateW26-610.9252.50-0.46
8vsKansasW43-0-14.812625.20220-0.01
9@Iowa StateL7-147.512957.900.26
10vsTexasW24-710.618995.512800.04
11@OklahomaL20-3825.57426.010.74

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
19.5%
Passing plays
3.2%
Rushing plays
32.6%
Standard downs
23.3%
Passing downs
10.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.25
Passing downs
0.24
Pass / Rush EPA
0.33 / 0.24

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.860−0.58
EPA per play · 2017 · 10 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.