Skip to content
D'Eriq King

#1D'Eriq King

QB·Miami·202020189.7 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

D'Eriq King is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Miami. D'Eriq's 2020 season ranks in the 57th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 438 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So D'Eriq King's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2020 Production

Passing
211/329 Comp/Att2686 Pass yards23 Pass TD5 INT64.1% Comp %
Rushing
538 Rush yards4 Rush TD130 Carries4.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency57
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency85
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)57th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency85th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.67 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Duke (SP+ -4).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6700.67Wk 2 vs UAB: +0.48 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Louisville: +0.52 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Florida State: +0.45 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Clemson: -0.01 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Pittsburgh: +0.34 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Virginia: +0.36 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs NC State: +0.49 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Virginia Tech: +0.17 EPA/play11Wk 14 vs Duke: +0.67 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs North Carolina: +0.52 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Oklahoma State: +0.18 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
2vsUABW31-146.316/24144108310.48
3@LouisvilleW47-346.518/3032530900.52
4vsFlorida StateW52-10-4.929/40267206500.45
6@ClemsonL17-4226.112/2812102841-0.01
7vsPittsburghW31-196.016/31222423200.34
8vsVirginiaW19-140.921/30322102800.36
10@NC StateW44-410.031/414305010500.49
11@Virginia TechW25-2413.724/38255101510.17
14@DukeW48-0-4.216/24248304610.67
15vsNorth CarolinaL26-6218.018/30239215300.52
1vsOklahoma StateL34-3714.210/13113101800.18

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
57.4%
Passing plays
86.9%
Rushing plays
26.5%
Standard downs
48.9%
Passing downs
73.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.23
Passing downs
0.57
Pass / Rush EPA
0.36 / 0.45

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.050−0.112020
EPA per play · 2018 — 2020 · 22 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2018Houston
14.0
307.4
2020Miami
9.7
244.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.