Skip to content
D'Angelo Brewer

#4D'Angelo Brewer

RB·Tulsa·20172.5 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

D'Angelo Brewer is a Featured Back for Tulsa. D'Angelo's 2017 season ranks in the 8th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 291 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So D'Angelo Brewer's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2017 Production

Rushing
1517 Rush yards9 Rush TD288 Carries5.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
9 Receptions88 Rec yards0 Rec TD9.8 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Punt returns4 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency8
  • Volume100
  • Explosiveness46
  • Consistency78
  • Receiving18
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)8th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.42 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs New Mexico (SP+ -12).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4200.42Wk 1 vs Oklahoma State: -0.05 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Louisiana: +0.40 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Toledo: +0.15 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs New Mexico: +0.42 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Navy: +0.04 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Tulane: +0.23 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Houston: +0.27 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs SMU: +0.03 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Memphis: +0.17 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs South Florida: +0.18 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Temple: +0.35 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@Oklahoma StateL24-5919.122331.501180-0.05
2vsLouisianaW66-42-15.8382626.930.40
3@ToledoL51-546.6381524.010.15
4vsNew MexicoL13-16-12.4161318.2111100.42
5vsNavyL21-31-0.722653.011700.04
6@TulaneL28-62-5.77415.9011200.23
7vsHoustonW45-177.7231406.110.27
9@SMUL34-38-2.9331564.710.03
10vsMemphisL14-417.8211195.701100.17
12@South FloridaL20-2710.2341634.8033600.18
13vsTempleL22-430.5342557.511300.35

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
36.2%
Passing plays
3.5%
Rushing plays
54.4%
Standard downs
44.7%
Passing downs
18.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.36
Pass / Rush EPA
0.61 / 0.18

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.470−0.10
EPA per play · 2017 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.