Skip to content
Connor Halliday

#12Connor Halliday

QB·Washington State·201420137.5 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Connor Halliday is a 2-year Clutch Passer for Washington State. Connor's 2014 season ranks in the 28th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 512 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Connor Halliday's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Passing
354/526 Comp/Att3873 Pass yards32 Pass TD11 INT67.3% Comp %
Rushing
-131 Rush yards0 Rush TD29 Carries-4.5 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency28
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency77
  • Clutch82
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)28th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.08 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.59 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs California (SP+ -1).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5900.59Wk 1 vs Rutgers: +0.48 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Nevada: +0.05 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Portland State: +0.49 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Oregon: +0.30 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Utah: +0.07 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs California: +0.59 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Stanford: +0.03 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Arizona: +0.13 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs USC: +0.25 EPA/play10
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsRutgersL38-41-1.540/565325178.2-1600.48
2@NevadaL13-24-7.338/573891227.8-2200.05
3vsPortland StateW59-2141/625446281.5-1200.49
4vsOregonL31-3824.743/634364065.6-600.30
5@UtahW28-278.839/614174235.1-2500.07
6vsCaliforniaL59-60-0.649/707346089.61700.59
7@StanfordL17-3421.442/692922139.3-5600.03
9vsArizonaL37-597.656/794894237.1-1100.13
10vsUSCL17-4417.16/9400118.20.25

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
71.7%
Passing plays
89.6%
Rushing plays
7.6%
Standard downs
68.7%
Passing downs
77.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.19
Passing downs
0.40
Pass / Rush EPA
0.28 / -0.90

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.650−0.112014
EPA per play · 2013 — 2014 · 22 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2013Washington State
0.4
100.8
2014Washington State
7.5
212.9

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.