Skip to content
Christian Turner
Christian Turner

#28Christian Turner

Christian Turner is a Committee Back for Indiana. Christian's 2023 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 50 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Christian Turner's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
227 Rush yards2 Rush TD52 Carries4.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
4 Receptions0 Rec yards0 Rec TD0.0 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns3 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume35
  • Explosiveness28
  • Consistency29
  • Receiving27
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency29th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.22 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.41 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Indiana State.

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4100.41Wk 1 vs Ohio State: +0.13 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Indiana State: +0.41 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Louisville: -0.04 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Akron: +0.23 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Maryland: -0.20 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Michigan: -0.03 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Rutgers: +0.05 EPA/play8
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsOhio StateL3-2325.27294.100.13
2vsIndiana StateW41-73113.710.41
3vsLouisvilleL14-218.0294.501-30-0.04
4vsAkronW29-27-21.613675.210.23
5@MarylandL17-4411.015614.10200-0.20
7@MichiganL7-5231.38273.40-0.03
8vsRutgersL14-313.54235.801300.05

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
12.3%
Passing plays
1.8%
Rushing plays
23.3%
Standard downs
14.3%
Passing downs
8.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.03
Passing downs
0.24
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.86 / 0.11

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.