Skip to content
Chase Brown

#2Chase Brown

RB·Illinois·202220211.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Chase Brown is a 2-year Featured Back for Illinois. Chase's 2022 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 322 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Chase Brown's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Rushing
1643 Rush yards10 Rush TD328 Carries5.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
27 Receptions240 Rec yards3 Rec TD8.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Explosiveness40
  • Consistency16
  • Receiving39
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency16th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.2700.27Wk 1 vs Wyoming: -0.03 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Indiana: -0.03 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Virginia: +0.22 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Chattanooga: +0.19 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Wisconsin: -0.10 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Iowa: +0.02 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Minnesota: +0.26 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Nebraska: +0.11 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Michigan State: -0.27 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Purdue: +0.05 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Michigan: +0.06 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Northwestern: +0.13 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsWyomingW38-6-10.8191517.923161-0.03
1@IndianaL20-23-7.1361995.50160-0.03
2vsVirginiaW24-3-9.0201467.301300.22
4vsChattanoogaW31-0201085.412600.19
5@WisconsinW34-108.3251295.21160-0.10
6vsIowaW9-612.7311464.7041700.02
7vsMinnesotaW26-1416.0411804.4035310.26
9@NebraskaW26-9-1.2321494.7131310.11
10vsMichigan StateL15-231.2331364.102210-0.27
11vsPurdueL24-317.723984.3233200.05
12@MichiganL17-1932.0291404.8232400.06
13@NorthwesternW41-3-13.419613.2114300.13

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
39.4%
Passing plays
8.5%
Rushing plays
62.4%
Standard downs
46.1%
Passing downs
23.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.05
Passing downs
0.13
Pass / Rush EPA
0.26 / 0.05

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+2.590−0.532022
EPA per play · 2021 — 2022 · 22 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021Illinois
2.3
56.3
2022Illinois
1.4
51.3

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.