Skip to content
Carter Jones

#6Carter Jones

Carter Jones is a Volume Passer for Nevada. Carter's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 180 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Carter Jones's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
111/173 Comp/Att1001 Pass yards6 Pass TD8 INT64.2% Comp %
Rushing
39 Rush yards0 Rush TD33 Carries1.2 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

14
Attempts
8.9y
Avg depth
9.0y
After catch
64%
Catch rate

The ball travels 8.9 yards in the air on an average throw 1.1 yards deeper than the median. Another 9.0 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
2
100% · 105y
short
6
67% · 32y
1
100% · 20y
5
40% · 6y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency0
  • Clutch1
Player type
Volume Passer

High-rep offense that leans on this QB's arm — value comes through cumulative production across a high number of plays.

High play countFranchise-volume role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Peak game: 0.77 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs San José State (SP+ -14).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7700.77Wk 4 vs Western Kentucky: -0.70 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Fresno State: +0.56 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs San Diego State: +0.01 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs New Mexico: +0.37 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Boise State: -0.19 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Utah State: -0.73 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs San José State: +0.77 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Wyoming: +0.12 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs UNLV: -0.13 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
4@Western KentuckyL16-311.60/10001.7-0.70
6@Fresno StateL17-201.811/151212190.5800.56
7vsSan Diego StateL10-446.716/32177124.8-100.01
8@New MexicoL22-240.923/292020062.31400.37
9vsBoise StateL3-243.116/291440318.4-20-0.19
11@Utah StateL14-51-3.11/6-1020.0-20-0.73
12vsSan José StateW55-10-14.316/191952092.0500.77
13@WyomingW13-7-11.311/17581052.43400.12
14vsUNLVL17-424.317/251050022.9-170-0.13

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
37.2%
Passing plays
71.0%
Rushing plays
9.6%
Standard downs
31.9%
Passing downs
47.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.19
Passing downs
-0.00
Pass / Rush EPA
0.18 / -0.11

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.