Skip to content
Brayden Fowler-Nicolosi
Brayden Fowler-Nicolosi

#16Brayden Fowler-Nicolosi

Brayden Fowler-Nicolosi is a Dual-Threat QB for Colorado State. Brayden's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 95 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Brayden Fowler-Nicolosi's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
44/82 Comp/Att488 Pass yards1 Pass TD2 INT53.7% Comp %
Rushing
-3 Rush yards1 Rush TD14 Carries-0.2 Yards/carry
Punting
2 Punts81 Punt yards40.5 Yards/punt44 Long2 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency84
  • Clutch83
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency84th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3400.34Wk 1 vs Washington: +0.29 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Northern Colorado: +0.34 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs UTSA: +0.06 EPA/play4
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@WashingtonL21-3818.417/321801156.8-600.29
2vsNorthern ColoradoW21-1713/251320140.12210.34
4vsUTSAL16-173.714/251760012.6-1900.06

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
46.3%
Passing plays
84.8%
Rushing plays
8.7%
Standard downs
34.4%
Passing downs
67.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.12
Passing downs
0.34
Pass / Rush EPA
0.26 / 0.51

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.