Skip to content
Al-Jay Henderson
Al-Jay Henderson

#5Al-Jay Henderson

Al-Jay Henderson is a Featured Back for Buffalo. Al-Jay's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 211 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Al-Jay Henderson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
755 Rush yards6 Rush TD182 Carries4.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
25 Receptions181 Rec yards1 Rec TD7.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume73
  • Explosiveness22
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving52
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.27 EPA/play decline from first to second half.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4300.43Wk 1 vs Minnesota: -0.12 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs St. Francis (PA): +0.32 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Kent State: -0.01 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Troy: +0.18 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs UConn: -0.07 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.21 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Massachusetts: -0.35 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Akron: -0.28 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Bowling Green: +0.06 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Central Michigan: -0.43 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Miami (OH): -0.31 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Ohio: +0.21 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@MinnesotaL10-231.511252.30-0.12
2vsSt. Francis (PA)W45-624984.1224200.32
3@Kent StateW31-28-19.315755.018380-0.01
4vsTroyL17-21-4.822763.5133500.18
5vsUConnL17-205.124632.603181-0.07
6vsEastern MichiganW31-30-14.716815.1023000.21
8@MassachusettsW28-21-36.620593.00490-0.35
9vsAkronL16-24-13.911676.10220-0.28
10@Bowling GreenW28-3-12.6181196.611700.06
12@Central MichiganL19-38-8.89394.30-0.43
13vsMiami (OH)L20-37-3.47223.10-0.31
14vsOhioL26-31-4.05316.210.21

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
25.7%
Passing plays
7.4%
Rushing plays
46.7%
Standard downs
28.5%
Passing downs
20.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.08
Passing downs
0.14
Pass / Rush EPA
0.35 / -0.09

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.810−0.33
EPA per play · 2024 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.