Skip to content
Al-Jay Henderson
Al-Jay Henderson

#5Al-Jay Henderson

RB·Buffalo·20242.2 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Al-Jay Henderson is a Explosive Back for Buffalo. Al-Jay's 2024 season ranks in the 20th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 195 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Al-Jay Henderson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
1078 Rush yards9 Rush TD204 Carries5.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
19 Receptions238 Rec yards1 Rec TD12.5 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns9 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency20
  • Volume69
  • Explosiveness46
  • Consistency68
  • Receiving43
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)20th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency68th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.71 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Toledo (SP+ -3).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7100.71Wk 1 vs Lafayette: +0.04 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Missouri: +0.03 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Massachusetts: -0.24 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Northern Illinois: +0.27 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs UConn: +0.15 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Toledo: +0.71 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Western Michigan: +0.63 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Ohio: +0.24 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Akron: +0.10 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Ball State: +0.40 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.20 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Kent State: +0.20 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsLafayetteW30-1314362.610.04
2@MissouriL0-3814.07263.700.03
3vsMassachusettsW34-3-21.95132.60110-0.24
4@Northern IllinoisW23-20-3.511565.112600.27
5@UConnL3-471.5242.000.15
7vsToledoW30-15-2.5181427.901600.71
8vsWestern MichiganL41-48-10.212978.1144900.63
9@OhioL16-472.314815.8032400.24
10@AkronW41-30-17.9181075.9132200.10
12vsBall StateW51-48-19.8271264.7221900.40
13@Eastern MichiganW37-20-13.325863.4117510.20
14vsKent StateW43-7-33.0301856.210.20
20vsLibertyW26-70.2211195.712360

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
24.3%
Passing plays
5.7%
Rushing plays
37.9%
Standard downs
27.0%
Passing downs
19.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.18
Passing downs
0.56
Pass / Rush EPA
0.96 / 0.20

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.810−0.33
EPA per play · 2024 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.