Idaho vs. Nevada: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats

Idaho
▸
Nevada0-1
Final
Mackay Stadium
IDAHTeam statsNEV
463Total yards266
313Pass148
150Rush118
18First downs14
3-123rd down5-16
1Turnovers3
33:58Possession26:02
- Q4 7:12IDAHRicardo Chavez 29 Yd Field Goal 33–6
- Q4 12:35IDAHRicardo Chavez 43 Yd Field Goal 30–6
- Q3 1:06IDAHRicardo Chavez 34 Yd Field Goal 27–6
- Q3 11:53IDAHAlex Moore 15 Yd pass from Gevani McCoy (Ricardo Chavez Kick)24–6
- Q2 0:03IDAHRicardo Chavez 26 Yd Field Goal 17–6
- Q2 9:36NEVBrandon Talton 44 Yd Field Goal 14–6
- Q1 0:01IDAHNick Romano 15 Yd Run (Ricardo Chavez Kick)14–3
- Q1 11:40NEVBrandon Talton 29 Yd Field Goal 7–3
- Q1 14:47IDAHTuron Ivy Jr. 75 Yd pass from Gevani McCoy (Ricardo Chavez Kick)7–0
How the model called it
Market line
IDAH −4
Against the number
IDAH covered
line IDAH −4
What the numbers say
- IDAH played behind the sticks — third downs that long convert rarely, and NEV did not face the same ones. 3rd & 7.7 vs 3rd & 5.0
Kickoff134 plays →Final
Tap or hover on the chart to see play details
NEV (top)IDAH (bottom)· colored dots = scoresFinal: NEV 0%
Closing line
IDAH −4
Closing total
51.5
Model line
—
Actual result
IDAH 33 – 6 NEV
Idaho
- PassGevani McCoy 15/21, 313 YDS, 2 TD
- RushAnthony Woods 18 CAR, 71 YDS
- RecHayden Hatten 5 REC, 85 YDS
Nevada
- PassBrendon Lewis 12/24, 104 YDS, 1 INT
- RushSean Dollars 9 CAR, 48 YDS
- RecJamaal Bell 8 REC, 67 YDS
26.9sper snap · slower the national 24.5s
fastnational avgslow
Snaps run
123
Points / snap
0.32
This exact spot, historically
empirical, no ratingsIDAH up 21 entering the 4th quarter. Across 669 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
99%
IDAH went on to win
A near-lock historically
FAQ
What was the final score of Idaho vs. Nevada?
Idaho 33, Nevada 6.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
No — the model picked NEV, which didn't hit. We report the misses too.
IDAH
NEV
40%
Success rate
38%
0.66
EPA / pass
-0.22
0.13
EPA / rush
0.17
41%
Early-down success
38%
40%
Pass success
35%
41%
Rush success
42%
21%
Explosive play rate (15+ yds)
8%
24%
Stuffed rush rate
25%
40%
Pass rate
61%
7.7
Avg 3rd-down distance
5.0
IDAH
7.7 yards to go on 3rd down
62 scrimmage snaps
NEV
5.0 yards to go on 3rd down
61 scrimmage snaps
| IDAH | NEV | |
|---|---|---|
| 463 | Total yards | 266 |
| 313 | Passing yards | 148 |
| 150 | Rushing yards | 118 |
| 18 | First downs | 14 |
| 3-12 | 3rd down | 5-16 |
| 3-3 | 4th down | 1-3 |
| 15/21 | Comp/Att | 20/38 |
| 14.9 | Yards per pass | 3.9 |
| 3.9 | Yards per rush | 4.7 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 3 |
| 3-30 | Penalties | 3-15 |
| 33:58 | Possession | 26:02 |
IDAH
8/9 with the model
−0.5 pts · −0.0% win prob
NEV
6/8 with the model
−1.8 pts · −0.0% win prob
Costliest call
Q3 10:40 NEV go for it on 4th & 14 at NEV 21. The model preferred punt, a gap of 1.20 points.
Drive chart
every possession, start to finishIDAH 7/11 scoring drives← own end zone →NEV 2/9 scoring drives
IDAHTD1 pl, 75 yds· own 25Q1
NEVFG7 pl, 53 yds· own 37Q1
IDAHFUM1 pl, 14 yds· own 29Q1
IDAHPUNT3 pl, 8 yds· own 4Q1
NEVINT12 pl, 54 yds· own 28Q1
IDAHTD6 pl, 81 yds· own 19Q1
NEVFG15 pl, 49 yds· own 25Q2
IDAHPUNT3 pl, 5 yds· own 25Q2
NEVPUNT5 pl, 20 yds· own 20Q2
IDAHFG12 pl, 77 yds· own 14Q2
NEVPUNT3 pl, 8 yds· own 35Q3
IDAHTD5 pl, 59 yds· own 41Q3
NEVDOWNS10 pl, 67 yds· own 25Q3
IDAHFG11 pl, 75 yds· own 8Q3
NEVINT1 pl, 0 yds· own 25Q3
IDAHFG7 pl, 23 yds· opp 49Q3
NEVDOWNS4 pl, 7 yds· own 19Q4
IDAHFG8 pl, 14 yds· opp 26Q4
NEVFUM5 pl, 19 yds· own 25Q4
IDAHEND6 pl, 27 yds· opp 44Q4
- Q4 7:12IDAHRicardo Chavez 29 Yd Field Goal 33–6
- Q4 12:35IDAHRicardo Chavez 43 Yd Field Goal 30–6
- Q3 1:06IDAHRicardo Chavez 34 Yd Field Goal 27–6
- Q3 11:53IDAHAlex Moore 15 Yd pass from Gevani McCoy (Ricardo Chavez Kick)24–6
- Q2 0:03IDAHRicardo Chavez 26 Yd Field Goal 17–6
- Q2 9:36NEVBrandon Talton 44 Yd Field Goal 14–6
- Q1 0:01IDAHNick Romano 15 Yd Run (Ricardo Chavez Kick)14–3
- Q1 11:40NEVBrandon Talton 29 Yd Field Goal 7–3
- Q1 14:47IDAHTuron Ivy Jr. 75 Yd pass from Gevani McCoy (Ricardo Chavez Kick)7–0
Model prediction
how the number is builtOne or both teams lack a power rating (often an FCS opponent), so the model prediction is low-confidence for this game.
The matchup, in context
series history + adjusted profilesThe series16 meetings since 1924
Nevada leads 10–6 · 13% have been one-possession games
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →






