Skip to content

App State Mountaineers

Sun Belt·2-0·
Elo
1310#115
SP+
-7.2#93
FPI
-5.2
AP
NR
Nextvs Charlotte · Wk 3Win prob 79%Model -12.1
Talent #85 (621.6)Recruiting class #5938% production returning

Team Leaders

Latest on App State

All news

East Carolina's power game runs into App State's best unit

Matchup · 5d ago

App State runs away from Maine, 55-3

Matchup · 6d ago

Roster · 109 players

FR 30SO 14JR 21SR 44
#PlayerPosClHtWt
3Malachi SingletonQBSR6'1"225
8Henry HasselbeckQBJR6'3"200
10Gregory FeeQBSO6'5"215
15Bronzden ChaffinQBFR6'4"235
17Tommy UlatowskiQBSR6'1"195
2Kanye RobertsRBSR6'0"205
5Jaquari LewisRBSO5'10"205
11Ja'Quez CrossRBSR5'9"195
26Max GuestRBSO5'9"190
31Jaysen AnguloRBSR6'0"205
39Treyaun WebbRBSR5'11"220
48JMarion BurnetteRBJR6'2"220
0Sam Pickett IIIWRSO6'0"185
1Nate BranchWRJR5'9"180
6Chris LoftonWRSR6'0"185
12Sam MbakeWRSR6'3"205
13Jackson GrierWRSR5'11"195
16Alexander SanchezWRSO6'2"200
18Kamauri AustinWRFR6'4"205
22Semaj FlemingWRSO5'8"175
28Cash BrownWRFR5'10"155
80Doopah ColemanWRSO5'11"195
81Derick BrazilWRJR6'0"175
82Zalin IngramWRJR6'3"185
83Dazmin JamesWRSR6'2"200
84Ryan MorrisonWRJR6'0"180
88Kabran PaulWRFR5'10"165
89Zach TaylorWRJR6'4"175
7Darrin FugittTESR6'5"240
19Jamel HowseTEFR6'4"250
45Gavin BarberTEFR6'3"240
85Luke DouglasTEJR6'5"240
86Brice WilliamsonTEFR6'3"240
87Dillon GallowayTESO6'4"245
50Eisa EvansOLFR6'6"300
52Cayden SweattOLSR6'4"300
55Ben JonesOLFR6'3"295
56Jayden ThomasOLJR6'4"305
57Devon ManuelOLSR6'7"325
60Caden MuskusOLFR6'5"300
63Scottland DoverOLFR6'5"305
64Jarvis PottsOLFR6'4"290
65Mac WaltersOLSR6'6"300
66Danny StevensOLSR6'4"300
67Trent RamseyOLSR6'5"315
68Lance WilliamsOLSR6'3"305
70Big Al OliverOLSO6'5"305
72Nick KashubaraOLFR6'4"295
73Tre GloverOLFR6'4"315
74Kamron BurrisOLSR6'5"305
75Greydon GrimesOLJR6'6"290
76Jahlon HarrisOLFR6'6"315
77Daniel DavisOLSR6'6"300
78Tyriq PoindexterOLSR6'5"310
11Jordan HarrisDLFR6'6"235
19Christian WaringDLFR6'3"305
33Aiden BentonDLSR6'2"250
41Caleb SandstromDLSR6'3"250
44Manny LewisDLFR6'2"280
45Nick CampbellDLSR6'4"290
46Nick AveryDLSO6'5"280
50Jehchys BrownDLSR6'2"300
58Chris DoyleDLFR6'2"300
84Sawyer ArnoldDLFR6'4"230
88Kaden EllisDLSO6'1"300
93Keaton BraddockDLJR6'5"230
94Caleb PittsDLSO6'2"265
95Ki'Shawn HarveyDLSR6'1"320
96Ricky LoloheaDLJR6'3"310
97Xavier JosephDLFR6'2"255
98Kelvin CrawfordDLSO6'2"230
99Aaron ClarkDLJR6'0"305
5Carson SloanLBJR6'2"230
10Colton PharesLBSR6'2"225
13Keshawn ThomasLBSR6'1"230
15Alex MitchellLBSR6'1"235
16Kevin HendersonLBJR5'11"215
22BJ JuniusLBFR6'0"205
35Brooks YurachekLBSR6'1"225
49Randy Marion IIILBSR6'0"210
52Michael McclentonLBFR6'0"230
0Juan BerchalDBSO5'10"185
1Ja'Den McBurrowsDBSR5'11"195
2Micah WilliamsDBFR6'0"180
3Ja'Cari HendersonDBSR6'0"180
4Jakob GudeDBJR5'11"190
6Khalil ConleyDBJR5'11"185
7Devin HendersonDBJR5'10"200
8Dre WalkerDBSR6'2"195
9Ahmad RobinsonDBSR6'0"180
12Cary GrantDBSR6'2"195
17DaRon WilsonDBJR6'2"190
18Syncere BerryDBFR6'2"180
20Eric AdamsDBSR6'1"205
21Joe ReddishDBSR5'11"190
24Josh WilliamsDBSR5'10"190
26Kaleb PurdyDBSR5'11"185
27Cam FlemingDBSR6'0"195
30Dorrian MedleyDBFR6'3"175
36Luke LairDBSR6'2"190
39Kavin WhiteDBJR6'0"195
29Carter EverettPKSR5'10"195
36Andrew CummingsPKFR5'8"195
83James LondonPKSR6'0"195
40Jaxson DunnPJR6'1"190
43Evan MulcarePFR6'0"170
34Parker StoneLSSR6'4"220
42Cale SchiralliLSFR6'0"190
47Hardy ButlerLSFR5'10"205

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
41.0
scoring offense
Points allowed
13.5
scoring defense
Differential
+27.5
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
521.0#23
Yards / play
7.2#28
Passing yards / game
307.5#29
Rushing yards / game
213.5#40
First downs / game
27.5#22
3rd down %
33.3%#106
4th down %
100.0%#1
Time of possession
34:30#20
Defense
Yards allowed / game
333.5#79
Yards / play allowed
5.1#74
Pass yards allowed / game
214.0#82
Rush yards allowed / game
119.5#79
3rd down % allowed
28.6%#44
Sacks
4#42
Tackles for loss
14#20
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
+3#14
Takeaways
4#14
Giveaways
1#31
Penalties / game
8.5#107
Penalty yards / game
55.0#75

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

App State is in year 2 under Dowell Loggains. The strengths are defensive, led by 28th at keeping everything in front of them. The way in is 118th at keeping opponents off schedule through the air, and they are 118th on early downs defensively.

App State has not played an FBS opponent yet, so this is the projection: last season regressed toward the mean, plus returning production, recruiting, talent and whether the staff is the same one.

Projected strengths

  • Defensehitting chunk plays
    #28
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Defensestaying on schedule through the air
    #118
    projected
  • Defensefirst and second down
    #118
    projected
  • Defensesurviving second and twelve
    #111
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
6.75.3
projected final record (now 20)
Exp. wins left
4.7
of 10 games
Bowl odds
80%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
79%
vs Charlotte
Toughest
13%
vs NC State

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

23456789101112
final winstallest bar = 27% chance
Likeliest finish 7-5 (27%)Bowl eligible 80% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
QBMalachi Singleton, Henry Hasselbeck
+33.2 EPA
WRJackson Grier, Chris Lofton +3
+25.4 EPA
TEDarrin Fugitt, Jamel Howse +2
+12.1 EPA
RBJa'Quez Cross, Jaquari Lewis
+4.5 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
EPA +33.20.519/play64 snaps
EPA +3.10.120/play26 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.3057th#60
Def0.1634th#91
Explosiveness
Off1.3264th#51
Def1.1569th#43
Field position
Off68.433rd#93
Def76.715th#118
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off4.5665th#49
Def2.7069th#44
Turnovers
Won 4Lost 1
Margin +3

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.6685th#22
Off · rush
0.0739th#85

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.0737th#87
Def0.269th#125
Passing
Off0.6685th#22
Def0.0869th#43

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
2.34#119
2nd-level / open-field
1.03 / 0.78
Power / stuff (off)
83.3% / 23.1%
Havoc — total (def)
19.4%#47
Havoc — front 7 / DB
11.2% / 8.2%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.13
Def0.20
Pass downs
Off0.61
Def0.07

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense-0.02#940.59#210.50#80
Defense0.07#980.24#950.19#38

Elo Trajectory

MaineFinal
Elo rating 13101322+12 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 31 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.6194th
  • Defense EPA/play allowed-0.0776th
  • Offense success rate65%96th
  • Defense success rate allowed31%69th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs64%91st
  • Offense success — passing downs67%98th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs36%73rd
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs21%66th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.248th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.245th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs1.155th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs1.834th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards3.678th
  • Defense line yards allowed1.786th
  • Offense highlight yards2.891st
  • Defense highlight yards allowed0.3567th
  • Offense power success1.099th
  • Defense power success allowed0.0099th
  • Offense stuff rate0.1081st
  • Defense stuff rate0.3184th

Third down

  • Third down conversion29%17th
  • Third down distance faced5.682nd
  • Third down conversion allowed43%34th
  • Third down distance forced7.964th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.3281st
  • Net success rate — second half0.4096th

Roster

  • Returning usage52%63rd
  • Returning EPA10850th
  • Team talent composite62239th
  • Recruiting class rank59.058th
  • Recruiting class points19958th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

EPA/play
+0.297#60 · average
Pass EPA/play
+0.656#22
Rush EPA/play
+0.072#87
Explosiveness
1.322#51
Pts/opportunity
4.56#49
Success rate
44.9%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.585 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

High-pressure defense — allowing above-average EPA/play
EPA/play allowed
+0.163#91 · below avg
Havoc rate (total)
19.4%#47
Front-7 havoc
11.2%
DB havoc
8.2%
Big play rate allowed
1.150#43
Success rate allowed
42.3%

Disruption comes evenly from front and secondary.

📊

Season Signature

41.0 PPG offense, 13.5 allowed — +27.5 margin/game
Points per game
41.0
Points allowed/game
13.5
Scoring margin/game
+27.5
Turnover margin
+3won 4 · lost 1
Production returning
38%
Talent rank (247)
#85

2-0 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE57thEXPLOSIVENESS64thFINISHING65thFIELD POS33thDEFENSE34thHAVOC66th50th100th
Offense
57th
Explosiveness
64th
Finishing
65th
Field Pos
33th
Defense
34th
Havoc
66th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
-8.2
#102
Offense
-5.0
#109
Defense
+3.2
#96
Full CORE ratings →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. App State is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to App State in 2026

by EPA/play distance
North TexasSP+ -13.2
Off EPA/play +0.307Def EPA/play +0.169Elo 1590
Match
99%
HoustonSP+ +6.5
Off EPA/play +0.312Def EPA/play +0.183Elo 1514
Match
99%
UConnSP+ -6.3
Off EPA/play +0.303Def EPA/play +0.136Elo 1484
Match
99%
West VirginiaSP+ -4.4
Off EPA/play +0.319Def EPA/play +0.100Elo 1365
Match
96%
PurdueSP+ +1.2
Off EPA/play +0.351Def EPA/play +0.210Elo 1318
Match
96%
New Mexico StateSP+ -15.0
Off EPA/play +0.216Def EPA/play +0.178Elo 1259
Match
96%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: +13.0, #27 of 1282016: +13.8, #18 of 1282017: +5.5, #49 of 1302018: +12.8, #24 of 1302019: +10.2, #30 of 1302020: +16.7, #14 of 1242021: +15.1, #17 of 1302022: +1.0, #63 of 1312023: +3.3, #49 of 1332024: -13.3, #112 of 1342025: -18.4, #121 of 1362026: -8.2, #102 of 138
20152026
Now -8.2 · #102 of 138Best +16.7 in 2020Worst -18.4 in 2025

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20262-00-0
100%
1.7+0.3
20255-82-6
38%
5.3-0.3
20245-63-5
45%
4.6+0.4
20239-56-3
64%
9.7-0.7
20226-63-5
50%
7.1-1.1
202110-47-2
71%
11.3-1.3
20209-36-2
75%
8.7+0.3
201913-18-1
93%
10.6+2.4
201811-28-1
85%
10.9+0.1
20179-47-1
69%
9.4-0.4

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

0.5%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

0-0 so far, projected to finish 6.5-5.6. Wins the Sun Belt in 5.2%.

If they finish with…

69%
0 losses
13%
1 loss
0.3%
2 losses
0%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count. Better than even up to 0.

Win out and it is 69%. One bid goes to the best champion outside the four power leagues, so running the table only enters them into that argument.

up 0.2 points since preseason.

  • At 0 losses they are 69% where the average Sun Belt team is 80%.
  • The Sun Belt takes 0.14 bids in an average season.
  • One bid goes to the best champion outside the P4. They take it in 0.5% of seasons, having won their league in 96% of those.

App State’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk4at NC State2.3
  • wk8vs James Madison1.7
  • wk2at East Carolina1.6
  • wk11at Marshall1.2
  • wk6vs Old Dominion1.2
  • wk9at Georgia Southern1.2

Who to root for

Games App State is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk9Purdue over Penn State0.4
  • wk6Northern Illinois over Air Force0.3
  • wk10UTEP over Hawai'i0.3
  • wk9UConn over Air Force0.3
  • wk13Georgia Tech over Georgia0.3
  • wk10Wyoming over UNLV0.2
The full playoff picture →

Sun Belt

East division · 0-0 in league play, projected 4.2-3.88 of 14 by title odds
5.2%
Wins the Sun Belt
9.8%
Reaches the title game

The Sun Belt keeps divisions (East and West) and sends the winner of each — so App State can finish with the league’s second-best record and still stay home. The last berth is level on percentage in 47% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk8James Madison at App State14.8
  • wk6Old Dominion at App State9.8
  • wk9App State at Georgia Southern9.2
  • wk11App State at Marshall8.9

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Sun Belt race →

If not the playoff, then

66%
Bowl eligible
63%
Placed in a bowl
0.5%
In the playoff
36%
Season over in November

App State is 1-0 and needs 5 more wins from 11 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent. In 2.1% of seasons they get there and still go nowhere: there are more eligible teams than seats.

  • Salute to Veterans Bowl8.5%
  • New Orleans Bowl8.3%
  • 68 Ventures Bowl7.7%
  • Frisco Bowl7.4%
  • Myrtle Beach Bowl7.0%
  • Boca Raton Bowl6.7%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 8 have sent App State a player since 2010 — 15 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of App State's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
GraysonGA30
Miami NorthwesternFL30
WestsideSC21
EastsideGA20
NorcrossGA20
ConwayAR10
South Fort MyersFL10
TempleTX10
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.