App State vs. East Carolina: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats
APPTeam statsECU
- Q4 0:21ECUJa'Keith Hamilton 7 Yd pass from Mitch Griffis (Noah Perez Kick)27–24
- Q3 3:57APPJames London 37 Yd Field Goal 27–17
- Q3 10:36ECUJason Dickerson 61 Yd pass from Mitch Griffis (Noah Perez Kick)24–17
- Q3 12:12APPTreyaun Webb 13 Yd Run (James London Kick)24–10
- Q2 1:21ECUNoah Perez 33 Yd Field Goal 17–10
- Q2 8:44APPJaquari Lewis 10 Yd Run (James London Kick)17–7
- Q2 14:17APPMalachi Singleton 4 Yd Run (James London Kick)10–7
- Q1 0:44APPJames London 41 Yd Field Goal 3–7
- Q1 4:11ECUMichael Allen 2 Yd Run (Noah Perez Kick)0–7
How the model called it
East Carolina is favored on résumé and home field while losing All five unit matchups, and App State already won 21-19 on this field.
East Carolina is favored on a 9-4 season, 32.7 points a game and home field, and all three of those arguments come from last November. The field-level arguments run the other way: App State's defense holds a 4.39-standard-deviation edge over East Carolina's short-yardage and power game and a 4.37 edge against its run game, and App State won 21-19 the last time these two played on this field.
Cumulative margin after each quarter. Above the line = APP ahead, below = ECU ahead.
Play-by-play win probability isn't available for this game — scoreboard margin by quarter shown instead.
- PassMalachi Singleton 20/28, 267 YDS
- RushJaquari Lewis 17 CAR, 73 YDS, 1 TD
- RecSam Pickett III 4 REC, 86 YDS
- PassMitch Griffis 21/37, 230 YDS, 2 TD, 1 INT
- RushAshton Gray 16 CAR, 99 YDS
- RecJeremiah Melvin 7 REC, 94 YDS
FAQ
What was the final score of App State vs. East Carolina?
App State 27, East Carolina 24.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
No — the model picked ECU, which didn't hit. We report the misses too.
| APP | ECU | |
|---|---|---|
| 396 | Total yards | 417 |
| 267 | Passing yards | 230 |
| 129 | Rushing yards | 187 |
| 21 | First downs | 22 |
| 5-14 | 3rd down | 2-13 |
| 0-0 | 4th down | 2-2 |
| 20/28 | Comp/Att | 21/37 |
| 9.5 | Yards per pass | 6.2 |
| 2.9 | Yards per rush | 5.3 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 13-80 | Penalties | 8-72 |
| 36:06 | Possession | 23:54 |
- Q4 0:21ECUJa'Keith Hamilton 7 Yd pass from Mitch Griffis (Noah Perez Kick)27–24
- Q3 3:57APPJames London 37 Yd Field Goal 27–17
- Q3 10:36ECUJason Dickerson 61 Yd pass from Mitch Griffis (Noah Perez Kick)24–17
- Q3 12:12APPTreyaun Webb 13 Yd Run (James London Kick)24–10
- Q2 1:21ECUNoah Perez 33 Yd Field Goal 17–10
- Q2 8:44APPJaquari Lewis 10 Yd Run (James London Kick)17–7
- Q2 14:17APPMalachi Singleton 4 Yd Run (James London Kick)10–7
- Q1 0:44APPJames London 41 Yd Field Goal 3–7
- Q1 4:11ECUMichael Allen 2 Yd Run (Noah Perez Kick)0–7
Model prediction
how the number is builtOur model simulates the game drive by drive from each side's opponent-adjusted efficiency (ECU Elo 1477, APP Elo 1310 for reference), with home-field advantage. That projects ECU -10.4 (74% to win) — 3.9 points clear of ECU's market line of -6.5. That is a disagreement, not a betting edge — sides we favour have not covered at better than breakeven.
Why that percentage is worth reading: across 604 graded in-season games, the calls this model put near 58% came in at 58.2%. The full calibration table is published, bin by bin. Early in the season the cold-start path runs instead and calibrates less well (Brier 0.2028 against 0.1889).
Model as of Sep 1 · through week 1 · drive simulation
Season form — 2026
nationally rankedThe matchup, in context
series history + adjusted profiles#15 of 21 in 2026 by biggest miss · #9 of 21 in 2026 by longest odds.
The 2026 upset archive →East Carolina leads 8–5 · App State has won 3 straight · 23% have been one-possession games
| APP | ECU | |
|---|---|---|
| -12.8 (#115) | CORE overall | -1.4 (#76) |
| -4 / +9 | offense / defense | -0 / +1 |
| 2.08 | points / drive | 1.13 |
| 1.85 | allowed / drive | 2.96 |
| 15% | three-and-outs | 42% |
| -3 | pass over expected | -4 |
Bold is the side ahead. CORE strips the situation from every play and solves the schedule out across the league, so these compare two teams that never met.
Key matchups
The analyst read: each team's offense splits crossed against the opponent's defense, with the edges called out.
Create a free account →You get Pro free for 6 months. No card required.
East Carolina's power game runs into App State's best unit
East Carolina is favored on résumé and home field while losing All five unit matchups, and App State already won 21-19 on this field.
App State wins
The range of outcomes for this game. Each bar is how often the final margin lands in that range — the more it leans toward East Carolina, the more likely East Carolina wins.
App State has already won this game once
That 21-19 result is the most direct evidence on these two programs and it does not flatter the favorite. App State finished that season 5-8. East Carolina finished 9-4, had home field, and lost anyway. The résumé gap was wider that night than it is now, and it never reached the scoreboard, which matters when the reason to favor East Carolina by 8.2 is largely a résumé.
The projection still lands at East Carolina 35, App State 16, which is a bet that last season's 9-4 East Carolina shows up and that App State's 5-8 record described the roster better than one 21-19 night did. Both cases sit on real evidence, and the 21-19 head-to-head is the only game on file in which these two rosters were measured against each other rather than against separate schedules.
Each ingredient of our projection and the side it favors — bars toward East Carolina are why it's the pick (home field is counted separately).
Alabama turned off East Carolina's early Downs
East Carolina went three-and-out on 66.7% of its drives at Alabama and gained 12.7 yards per possession. The 10-48 scoreline says little, because Alabama flattens everyone. The drive log says more: a 66.7% three-and-out rate is a staying-on-schedule failure rather than a talent-gap scoreline, and staying on schedule is where App State's defense holds a 2.63-standard-deviation edge. East Carolina scored on 25% of twelve possessions.
App State scored on 90% of ten drives against Maine, went three-and-out on 10% of them, averaged 64.2 yards per possession and won 55-3. Maine does not re-rate an offense that scored 24.2 points a game last season on a 5-8 team. What the afternoon does rule out is a broken App State offense, and the 3 points allowed sit consistently alongside the defensive edges the matchup grades give this front.
Both of last week's results point the same way as the unit matchups, and that agreement is what makes East Carolina -8.2 uncomfortable rather than the scorelines themselves. East Carolina's problem in that game was structural rather than scoreboard-driven: the offense could not sustain a possession, and the 2.63 and 2.23 standard-deviation edges App State holds on schedule and in overall efficiency point at the same failure repeating.
Short yardage is the wrong plan against this front
Five unit matchups are graded and App State wins all five. The widest are 4.39 standard deviations against East Carolina's short-yardage and power game and 4.37 against its run game, with overall efficiency at 2.23 and App State's passing game at plus 3.60. A 4.39 reading is not a small structural preference; it says East Carolina's most reliable way to control a game at home is the phase it is worst equipped to win here.
Each unit matchup this season, sorted by how decisive it is — the top bar is what most tilts the game. Bars toward East Carolina are battles it should win; toward App State are ones App State wins.
Jaquari Lewis draws a run defense ranked 123rd of 185 by what it allows and projects for 24 to 61 rushing yards with a 34% chance of a touchdown. The band is wide because a back's volume projects and his per-carry efficiency does not, so Lewis is better read as touchdown equity against soft terrain than as a yardage engine. App State needs the version of this game where short-yardage downs get conceded.
Sam Mbake faces a pass defense ranked 164th of 185 and projects for 17 to 39 receiving yards, a modest band against soft coverage that says more about how App State spreads targets than about the matchup he draws. Brock Spalding has the harder job, 21 to 68 receiving yards against a pass defense ranked 49th of 185, so East Carolina's likeliest receiving production has to come against the better secondary on the field.
The defense decides how ugly this gets
App State allowed 3 points to Maine, which proves little by itself, and holds a 2.23-standard-deviation edge in overall efficiency against East Carolina's offense, which proves more. Read together they describe a defense that wins early downs and leaves offenses in long yardage, and East Carolina spent last week in exactly that situation on 66.7% of its drives without ever climbing out of it.
Points allowed per drive across all FBS defenses (lower is better). App State's defense is below average, better than only 0% of FBS defenses.
A defense that wins early downs against an offense that could not sustain a possession is how a projected 35-16 turns into something worse than 35-16. The chance somebody wins by 20 or more sits at 50%, and that outcome is not attached only to East Carolina. A total of 56.5 with the under at 40% says points are expected here, and the drive-efficiency gap suggests they arrive on one side of the ledger.
The Case for taking East Carolina at face value
A full season at 32.7 points a game is a far larger sample than one road trip to Alabama, and 55-3 over Maine is not evidence App State can score on an FBS defense. App State averaged 24.2 points a game last season while going 5-8, and Sam Mbake's 17 to 39 yard band is not the shape of a road offense that reaches 30. If last year's East Carolina shows up for three quarters, 8.2 is comfortable.
East Carolina's checklist is Short and specific
East Carolina needs first downs on first and second down and a plan that does not route through short yardage, where the 4.39 deficit lives. Reach third-and-manageable regularly and the rest cooperates: the projection covers -8.2 in roughly 74% of outcomes, and Brock Spalding's 21 to 68 receiving yards is where the home offense's most usable production is projected to come from.
App State needs to convert near last week's 90% drive-scoring rate, keep East Carolina in long yardage, and win the short-yardage exchanges the 4.39 edge says it should win. Do all three and the 21-19 template repeats. Miss on one and the score drifts toward 35-16, because a team that averaged 24.2 points a game last season has no proven gear for chasing points on the road.
Our coverage of this game
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →