Skip to content
Ty Hawkins

#1Ty Hawkins

QB·SMU·2025

Ty Hawkins is a Clutch Passer for SMU.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ty Hawkins's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
1/1 Comp/Att9 Pass yards0 Pass TD0 INT100.0% Comp %
Rushing
21 Rush yards0 Rush TD3 Carries7.0 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

13
Attempts
8.7y
Avg depth
2.5y
After catch
85%
Catch rate

The ball travels 8.7 yards in the air on an average throw about the median for the position. Another 2.5 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
1
100% · 35y
0
0
short
2
100% · 16y
2
100% · 15y
8
75% · 38y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency90
  • Volume10
  • Dual-Threat20
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)90th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.03 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs East Texas A&M.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0301.03Wk 1 vs East Texas A&M: +1.03 EPA/play1Wk 6 vs Syracuse: +0.96 EPA/play6
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsEast Texas A&MW42-131201.03
6vsSyracuseW31-18-13.11/190078.30.96
20vsArizonaW24-1912.090

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
3.6%
Passing plays
4.2%
Rushing plays
3.3%
Standard downs
4.3%
Passing downs
1.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.43
Passing downs
0.96
Pass / Rush EPA
0.78 / -0.00

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.