Skip to content
Troy Franklin

#11Troy Franklin

Troy Franklin is a Slot Specialist WR for Oregon. Troy's 2023 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 90 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Troy Franklin's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving
81 Receptions1383 Rec yards14 Rec TD17.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume31
  • Explosiveness67
  • Consistency76
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency76th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 12 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.52 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 5.51 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs USC (SP+ 9).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+5.5105.51Wk 1 vs Portland State: +1.19 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Texas Tech: +1.66 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Hawai'i: +1.79 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Colorado: +1.43 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Stanford: +1.70 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Washington: +0.48 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Washington State: +0.73 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Utah: +1.28 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs California: +1.32 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs USC: +5.51 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Arizona State: +1.46 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Oregon State: +1.59 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Washington: +0.18 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsPortland StateW81-7710615.12331.19
2@Texas TechW38-306.1610317.21721.66
3vsHawai'iW55-10-16.448320.80401.79
4vsColoradoW42-6-4.9812615.82361.43
5@StanfordW42-6-11.9711716.72461.70
7@WashingtonL33-3616.4815419.31490.48
8vsWashington StateW38-244.947919.80320.73
9@UtahW35-68.589912.41301.28
10vsCaliforniaW63-19-0.167913.21321.32
11vsUSCW36-279.4214773.51845.51
12@Arizona StateW49-13-11.3812816.02451.46
13vsOregon StateW31-712.6912814.21411.59
14vsWashingtonL31-3416.44348.50120.18

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
10.9%
Passing plays
20.2%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
9.5%
Passing downs
15.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.98
Passing downs
1.83
Pass / Rush EPA
1.27 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.