#20Trequan Jones

RB·Old Dominion·2025

Trequan Jones is a Explosive Back for Old Dominion. Trequan's 2025 season ranks in the 8th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 91 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.52
Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.41
Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Trequan Jones's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing

792 Rush yards6 Rush TD105 Carries7.5 Yards/carry

Receiving

6 Receptions20 Rec yards0 Rec TD3.3 Yards/rec

Returns

1 Kick returns22 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

Efficiency8
Volume37
Explosiveness90
Consistency0
Receiving37

Player type

Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)8th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.48 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 3.06 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs North Carolina Central.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Car	Rush Yds	Avg	Rush TD	Rec	Rec Yds	Rec TD	EPA/play
1	@Indiana	L14-27	32.4	—	—	—	—	1	6	0	-0.14
2	vsNorth Carolina Central	W54-6	—	5	163	32.6	3	—	—	—	3.06
3	@Virginia Tech	W45-26	-10.1	13	101	7.8	1	1	7	0	0.52
5	vsLiberty	W21-7	-9.0	16	89	5.6	0	—	—	—	-0.02
6	vsCoastal Carolina	W47-7	-15.1	14	98	7.0	0	1	1	0	0.13
7	@Marshall	L24-48	-4.5	6	26	4.3	0	—	—	—	-0.25
8	@James Madison	L27-63	12.3	4	4	1.0	0	—	—	—	-0.62
9	vsApp State	W24-21	-11.4	6	33	5.5	0	—	—	—	-0.03
10	@UL Monroe	W31-6	-21.6	4	14	3.5	0	—	—	—	-0.13
12	vsTroy	W33-0	-4.8	9	96	10.7	1	2	2	0	0.43
13	@Georgia Southern	W45-10	-9.4	14	73	5.2	0	—	—	—	-0.01
14	vsGeorgia State	W27-10	-24.5	6	39	6.5	0	1	4	0	0.08
20	vsSouth Florida	W24-10	11.6	8	56	7.0	1	—	—	—	—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

12.8%

Passing plays

2.6%

Rushing plays

19.7%

Standard downs

15.1%

Passing downs

7.1%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.04
Passing downs: 0.88
Pass / Rush EPA: -0.32 / 0.20

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).