Skip to content
Tre Richardson

#0Tre Richardson

Tre Richardson is a Versatile WR for Louisville.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Tre Richardson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Receiving
11 Receptions181 Rec yards1 Rec TD16.5 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns22 KR yards0 KR TD1 Punt returns13 PR yards0 PR TD

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

12
Targets
3.8y
Avg depth
10.3y
After catch
83%
Catch rate

The ball travels 3.8 yards in the air on an average target 5.1 yards shorter than the median. Another 10.3 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
1
0% · 0y
0
0
short
6
83% · 58y
1
100% · 24y
4
100% · 37y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume32
  • Explosiveness63
  • Consistency50
  • Pass-Down0
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Peak game: 1.23 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Ole Miss (SP+ 13).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2301.23Wk 1 vs Ole Miss: +1.23 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Villanova: +0.92 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsOle MissL38-4113.348320.81621.23
2vsVillanovaW59-1379814.00240.92

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
11.2%
Passing plays
21.7%
Rushing plays
2.7%
Standard downs
10.3%
Passing downs
13.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
1.23
Passing downs
0.75
Pass / Rush EPA
0.92 / 2.04

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.