Skip to content
Traeshon Holden
Traeshon Holden

#1Traeshon Holden

WR·Oregon·2024

Traeshon Holden is a Slot Specialist WR for Oregon. Traeshon's 2024 season produced 62.1 total EPA across 45 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Traeshon Holden's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Receiving
45 Receptions718 Rec yards5 Rec TD16.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume16
  • Explosiveness60
  • Consistency78
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • ▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • ▸9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • ▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.40 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • ▸Peak game: 2.17 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Idaho.

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.170−2.17Wk 1 vs Idaho: +2.17 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Boise State: +1.98 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Oregon State: +1.45 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs UCLA: +1.51 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Michigan State: +0.97 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Ohio State: +0.82 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Illinois: -0.76 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Michigan: +1.82 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Maryland: +1.25 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Wisconsin: +0.19 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Washington: +1.88 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Penn State: +0.27 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsIdahoW24-14—33612.00212.17
2vsBoise StateW37-3410.147819.51591.98
3@Oregon StateW49-14-6.734013.31201.45
5@UCLAW34-13-1.355711.41381.51
6vsMichigan StateW31-10-4.646315.80370.97
7vsOhio StateW32-3131.213232.00320.82
9vsIllinoisW38-99.6273.506-0.76
10@MichiganW38-1710.6614924.80471.82
11vsMarylandW39-18-3.923015.00201.25
12@WisconsinW16-133.03165.3070.19
14vsWashingtonW49-213.137324.30391.88
15vsPenn StateW45-3724.622110.50170.27
20vsOhio StateL21-4131.2711616.6244—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.5%
Passing plays
10.5%
Rushing plays
0.5%
Standard downs
4.1%
Passing downs
9.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
1.04
Passing downs
1.74
Pass / Rush EPA
1.42 / 0.45

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Traeshon Holden Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Oregon · Gridpex